Transcript: AAC — 18 Dec 2025 (Q&A)

WEBVTT

00:00:00.800 --> 00:00:02.620
It is the 18th of December.

00:00:02.620 --> 00:00:03.660
I am Corey J.

00:00:03.660 --> 00:00:06.360
Mahler, and this is At Any Cost.

00:00:06.360 --> 00:00:18.160
I think I will probably just jump right into the questions and answers section since there's not really any housekeeping this time, except for the usual sort of things at the end of the episode.

00:00:18.160 --> 00:00:25.840
I will assume that the audio is fine for everyone since I don't see any comments in the chat that it is not.

00:00:25.840 --> 00:00:28.160
So I will simply pull up the first question here.

00:00:30.940 --> 00:00:39.640
The first question is relatively long, but a very simple question, straightforward.

00:00:39.640 --> 00:00:46.420
So I will just give sort of the Cliffnote version of it, as it were.

00:00:46.420 --> 00:00:52.280
How do we have faith and not doubt is essentially the question.

00:00:52.280 --> 00:01:01.400
And so there are a lot of places in scripture where it says basically, if you have faith and you don't doubt, then certain things will happen.

00:01:01.400 --> 00:01:17.480
This is not sort of a prosperity gospel or therapeutic gospel or any of those various other, I'll be generous and call them heterodoxies, but you have to look at the places in which this is said in scripture.

00:01:17.480 --> 00:01:29.860
And many times you're dealing with Christ speaking in parables or speaking in riddles, which he very much enjoyed doing while he was serving in his ministry here on earth.

00:01:29.860 --> 00:01:50.220
And so, for instance, I think it's probably good to start by looking at the fig tree, because when Christ curses the fig tree, and then it withers basically immediately, and then will no longer produce fruit, and so he basically may no one ever eat fruit from you again.

00:01:51.440 --> 00:01:59.340
Does that mean that it is bad for the tree not to produce fruit in an off season?

00:01:59.340 --> 00:02:01.540
The answer for the tree is no.

00:02:01.540 --> 00:02:06.860
The answer for a human being, which is what he's getting at there, is yes.

00:02:06.860 --> 00:02:11.820
It's sort of akin to all of the parables about the thief coming in the night.

00:02:11.820 --> 00:02:25.240
You do not know when Christ is going to return, and so you shouldn't think, well, I'm young, I can sin for 30 years, and then I'll repent and everything will be fine, because Christ could come tomorrow.

00:02:25.240 --> 00:02:27.640
He could come in the middle of this recording.

00:02:27.640 --> 00:02:34.960
And so, probably not in the middle of this recording, there are some signs that aren't fulfilled, but he could come relatively soon.

00:02:34.960 --> 00:02:47.600
So, the point of the fig tree is that you don't put off producing those good fruits, because you are a Christian, and you should be producing those all the time.

00:02:47.600 --> 00:02:54.040
The point is not the tree itself, because obviously trees have a season, God created the seasons.

00:02:54.040 --> 00:02:58.380
It's not bad for the tree itself to not be producing in season.

00:02:58.380 --> 00:03:14.700
And so, with regard to having faith and not doubting, part of it comes down to the measure of faith that God has given you, of course, and you can think of the father who exclaims, Lord, I believe, help my unbelief.

00:03:14.700 --> 00:03:16.180
There's nothing wrong with that prayer.

00:03:16.180 --> 00:03:24.140
That's a perfectly legitimate prayer for a man to pray, because the measure of faith that you have been given is a gift from God.

00:03:24.140 --> 00:03:30.520
That's always important to remember that, that your faith is not your own work.

00:03:30.520 --> 00:03:32.720
It is something given you by God.

00:03:32.720 --> 00:03:35.760
Now, you can pray for an increase of your faith.

00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:49.120
Of course, that's part of what you're praying for every time you pray the Lord's prayer and, really, any other prayers, particularly if you're going through the Psalms and use them as a prayer book, which they're sort of a hymnal slash prayer book, so you can use it in both ways.

00:03:50.320 --> 00:04:06.560
But, insofar as not doubting is concerned, basically, don't dwell on, basically, doubts, the possibility of doubts, because you can always find some little thread to pull at with anything.

00:04:07.600 --> 00:04:17.820
And, in basically anything in life, if you start down that path, you're going to destroy whatever the thing is, which is why it's good to use the illustration of pulling on a thread.

00:04:17.820 --> 00:04:24.700
If I find a thread in my scarf and start pulling on it, pretty soon I'm not going to have a scarf.

00:04:24.700 --> 00:04:30.420
Now, granted, this one is wool, and so it'd be kind of hard to do, but you get the idea.

00:04:30.420 --> 00:04:45.800
If, for instance, in your relationship with your spouse, you find something that annoys you about your spouse, and you dwell on it, and you pick at it, and you poke at it, you're going to wind up divorced, and you're going to have done that to yourself.

00:04:45.800 --> 00:04:57.520
So, with regard to your faith, don't make shipwreck of your faith by finding some way in order to doubt, because you can always find some way to try to walk away from things.

00:04:57.520 --> 00:05:06.420
Apostasy is very possible, so don't apostatize as sort of the basic thing here, the foundational truth.

00:05:07.440 --> 00:05:33.380
When it comes to having that certainty of faith, you need to be active in your prayer life, you need to read the Word of God, because that is how God interacts with you, and trust in God that he will give you the measure of faith that is necessary to meet the challenges in your life, and to meet the challenges that will be brought up by the world, the flesh, and the devil, with regard to your faith.

00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:41.500
And there are a number of verses and passages of scripture of the individual cited here, and of course, anyone can go look at that.

00:05:41.500 --> 00:05:46.260
This one happens to be on the forum, and I try to do the ones on the forum first.

00:05:46.260 --> 00:05:51.300
So I think that's sort of the basic answer to that question.

00:05:51.300 --> 00:05:54.120
Perhaps I'll come back to that one at some point in the future.

00:05:54.120 --> 00:06:00.440
I think it's an important question that perhaps I will address in greater depth, so I'll make a note to do that.

00:06:07.893 --> 00:06:16.253
The next question is about pacifism, and particularly with a reference to Dirk Willems.

00:06:16.253 --> 00:06:19.453
I'll just read this one because it's relatively short.

00:06:19.453 --> 00:06:26.713
Among pacifists, one of the great heroes is Dirk Willems, who saved his enemy and got killed as a consequence.

00:06:26.713 --> 00:06:29.733
How do we argue against suicidal empathy?

00:06:29.733 --> 00:06:31.613
Anabaptists claim many martyrs.

00:06:31.613 --> 00:06:35.653
How to differentiate true martyrs from foolish people who got executed?

00:06:36.233 --> 00:06:37.873
And so, a number of related questions there.

00:06:37.873 --> 00:06:46.833
I'll start by just briefly recounting who Dirk Willems is, because many people are not going to know that name.

00:06:46.833 --> 00:06:55.133
There are, of course, many who will, if they're familiar with Anabaptists and their claims, but many others have no idea who that man is.

00:06:55.133 --> 00:07:08.453
So, Dirk Willems was, as you might have guessed, an Anabaptist who was imprisoned for being an Anabaptist, because at the time, in that particular area, it was a crime to be an Anabaptist.

00:07:08.453 --> 00:07:09.853
He escaped.

00:07:09.853 --> 00:07:15.853
And as he was fleeing, his pursuer fell through some thin ice.

00:07:15.853 --> 00:07:21.253
He turned around to help his pursuer and was recaptured as a result.

00:07:21.253 --> 00:07:34.493
Notably, the man who fell through the ice wanted to let him go, but he was reminded it was his duty, he was basically the captor, the jailer, and so it was his duty to recapture him.

00:07:34.493 --> 00:07:39.013
And subsequent to being recaptured, he was burned at the stake.

00:07:39.013 --> 00:07:46.013
So the question would be, in his case, was it right or foolish to do what he did?

00:07:47.033 --> 00:08:01.413
And that one comes down to how you view Anabaptist teaching, because if you come down on the side of Anabaptist teaching, being something that should be punished by the state, then he was a wicked man who needed to be punished.

00:08:01.413 --> 00:08:07.533
And so fleeing punishment for a crime you have, in fact, committed is anti-Christian.

00:08:07.533 --> 00:08:34.953
If you come down on the other side, and you're someone who believes in not freedom of religion, but freedom of denomination, and you think that he should have the right to teach whatever he pleases about scripture, maybe not whatever he pleases, that's a little too broad, but within reason, you think that he should be at least able to disagree, permitted to disagree, without repercussions with regard to the sacraments, with regard to baptism, specifically in this case, of course.

00:08:34.953 --> 00:08:44.093
If you come down on that side, then you're probably going to say, well, no, he was fleeing unjust persecution, and so he's permitted to do that.

00:08:44.093 --> 00:09:13.413
But of course, in both cases, it raises the question of, which is sort of the core of this, the underlying question, when is it your duty as a Christian to stand your ground, even if it results in your death, versus when are you permitted or even required according to wisdom and your duties before God and men, not to do that, not to basically surrender yourself to death.

00:09:13.413 --> 00:09:30.873
And this is partly a wisdom call, but partly not, because it's going to be very obvious if you are called on to confess Christ, and there is going to be very real consequences for doing that.

00:09:32.113 --> 00:09:48.673
So, for instance, if we happen to have a particularly wicked government, which we do, and they start calling Christians before tribunals and saying, renounce God, then you have to confess Christ and go to your death if necessary.

00:09:48.673 --> 00:09:57.113
That makes you a martyr, of course, and I'll get into what a martyr is in a second here, but that makes you a martyr, but that is your duty as a Christian.

00:09:57.113 --> 00:09:58.533
You do not get to deny Christ.

00:09:58.533 --> 00:10:23.473
We are not Muslims, we don't have a bunch of different kinds of lies that we are permitted to tell in order to make our life easier or more convenient, but we're not going so far as the sort of mischaracterization, I would say, of Kant, but the one of which everyone is aware of when you get into this area of discussion with regard to when you have to be truthful.

00:10:23.473 --> 00:10:35.053
The example that is usually used is if a psychopathic killer comes to your door, do you have to say, yes, my wife and children are home and they're hiding in the closet?

00:10:35.053 --> 00:10:35.913
The answer is no.

00:10:36.813 --> 00:10:45.353
And as a Christian, you have no duty to tell that person the truth, because you don't have a duty to tell all truths at all times to all men.

00:10:45.353 --> 00:10:50.053
You have a duty to speak the truth about Christ and never deny him.

00:10:50.053 --> 00:10:53.953
And so that is sort of the dividing line there.

00:10:53.953 --> 00:11:03.633
But with regard to a martyr, a martyr is someone who dies for the faith, who dies because of his Christian faith.

00:11:04.593 --> 00:11:16.133
And you're going to get people who get very nitpicky about that, because they'll say, well, he died because he had political disagreements, but he was also killed because he was a Christian.

00:11:16.133 --> 00:11:18.093
I would say he's a martyr, if that happens.

00:11:18.093 --> 00:11:19.233
This is a hypothetical man.

00:11:19.233 --> 00:11:22.993
I'm not saying this individual, in this case, Willems.

00:11:24.393 --> 00:11:34.473
But whether or not someone is a martyr is a question, essentially, of whether or not he died because of his Christian faith.

00:11:34.473 --> 00:11:53.833
And so perhaps an abstracted political example, an illustration, the Rwandan genocide, if you actually run the numbers as it were, you can make a very strong argument that it was a politicide instead of a genocide.

00:11:53.833 --> 00:12:00.853
Now, does that mean that it didn't have elements of being a genocide even if it were in fact mostly a politicide?

00:12:00.853 --> 00:12:04.033
The answer would be no, it still was a bit of both.

00:12:04.033 --> 00:12:12.933
Regardless of that, I have a particular professor from undergrad who wouldn't want me to make that argument, but he's just wrong if he disagrees.

00:12:12.933 --> 00:12:29.393
When it comes to someone being a martyr, even if there are elements of having died for something else, so you were killed because you were a member of a political party that the ruling class didn't like, but also because you're a Christian, I would say that counts as the person being a martyr.

00:12:29.393 --> 00:12:38.133
Now, I'm not getting into the specific definition that the Roman Catholic Church uses because I don't believe in it, because anyone who dies for the faith is a martyr.

00:12:38.133 --> 00:12:41.653
I'm not going to add additional requirements to that.

00:12:41.653 --> 00:12:53.033
And so, perhaps another ancillary point, but the traditional distinction between a martyr and a confessor is that a confessor doesn't die for the faith.

00:12:53.033 --> 00:12:54.473
He confesses the faith.

00:12:55.233 --> 00:13:07.813
And so, Martin Luther was a confessor of the faith, not a martyr, because he was, in fact, not killed for the faith, despite the fact that both the emperor and the pope tried for quite a while, and they just didn't succeed.

00:13:07.813 --> 00:13:12.793
So, he almost became a martyr many times, but he was not a martyr, he was a confessor.

00:13:12.793 --> 00:13:15.273
Sort of the distinction there.

00:13:16.793 --> 00:13:28.253
And so, when it comes down to assessing whether someone did something foolish or not, it is really that question of did you have to confess Christ?

00:13:28.253 --> 00:13:32.653
Were you called on to either confess or deny Christ before men?

00:13:32.653 --> 00:13:35.413
And if you die for that, you're a martyr.

00:13:35.413 --> 00:13:44.713
If you weren't called on to confess Christ, and you sort of just chose to die, that's probably foolish.

00:13:44.713 --> 00:13:53.913
And so, I'm thinking of the gentleman who decided he was going to sail onto an island full of crazed cannibals, essentially.

00:13:53.913 --> 00:13:57.693
That is definitely more foolish than martyr.

00:13:57.693 --> 00:13:59.573
I don't know that I'd be willing to say that he...

00:13:59.573 --> 00:14:04.113
there's absolutely nothing of martyrdom there, but he shouldn't have done it.

00:14:04.113 --> 00:14:05.013
It was dumb.

00:14:05.013 --> 00:14:06.633
It was foolish.

00:14:06.633 --> 00:14:10.173
That's not the way to evangelize some random tribe like that.

00:14:10.173 --> 00:14:12.473
That's essentially suicide.

00:14:12.473 --> 00:14:15.193
It's not something you should do.

00:14:15.193 --> 00:14:21.653
And then the last question here that I haven't really addressed yet is the suicidal empathy issue.

00:14:21.653 --> 00:14:36.213
And you can't really fix that issue without causing a lot of other problems, because it's not so much an individual issue, it's a structural issue.

00:14:36.213 --> 00:14:50.893
If you don't have a bunch of individuals living around your people who will take advantage of that, it's not a problem to have that desire to help others around you, if you're living in a society that is properly ordered.

00:14:50.893 --> 00:14:55.373
Our problem today is that we are not living in a properly ordered society.

00:14:55.373 --> 00:15:13.433
We are living around some much more than others, unfortunately, for them, but we are living around hostile foreigners who do not have the same morals, who do not have the same concerns, who are going to take advantage of us because of the fact that we have empathy, sympathy, whatever you want to call it.

00:15:13.433 --> 00:15:21.233
I'm not getting into that nest of vipers, quite frankly, with regard to people who think that empathy is a sin.

00:15:21.273 --> 00:15:24.013
It comes down to how you're defining your terms.

00:15:24.013 --> 00:15:35.173
But in this case, can you train someone to care about others and not run some risk of that being exploited?

00:15:35.173 --> 00:15:37.273
I think the answer is no.

00:15:37.273 --> 00:15:44.293
So you have to set up structural safeguards in your society and then it's a good thing to have.

00:15:44.293 --> 00:15:54.453
Now, at the same time, you can certainly train up, for instance, your children, not to simply care for everyone in the world, because you can't do that.

00:15:54.453 --> 00:16:01.213
You have to train them who is your neighbor, care for your neighbor, to whom do you owe a higher duty?

00:16:01.213 --> 00:16:18.893
If you have a higher duty to these people, so your family, for instance, probably the best example, naturally, can you fulfill that duty if instead you run off and pursue foreigners 4,000 miles away who kill you and eat you?

00:16:18.893 --> 00:16:20.253
Well, the answer is no.

00:16:20.253 --> 00:16:32.313
What you've done is you have neglected the higher and greater duty in pursuit of something that is not perhaps a duty at all, which would be sin, at the very least the sin of foolishness.

00:16:32.313 --> 00:16:34.733
And yes, it is sinful to be a fool.

00:16:34.733 --> 00:16:36.753
Scripture is abundantly clear on that one.

00:16:36.893 --> 00:16:38.313
Many, many examples.

00:16:40.133 --> 00:16:46.453
I think that pretty much answers that question, so I will move on to the next one.

00:16:49.253 --> 00:16:55.873
This one is another exegetical question, this one about Colossians 3, 5 through 8.

00:16:55.993 --> 00:17:00.813
So we'll actually just pull that up, since it's the best way to do that.

00:17:04.093 --> 00:17:05.113
Pull up Logos here.

00:17:21.830 --> 00:17:26.690
Logos just likes to add more steps in order to...

00:17:26.690 --> 00:17:29.730
Of course, now it looks like...

00:17:32.290 --> 00:17:33.770
Well, that's an interesting quirk.

00:17:33.770 --> 00:17:43.670
Looks like OBS actually focuses on the individual tab instead of the window, which makes that a little harder.

00:17:43.670 --> 00:17:45.850
Let me see if I can get it to do the right thing here.

00:17:45.850 --> 00:17:46.390
Okay, here we go.

00:17:50.330 --> 00:17:52.970
So, reading from Colossians 3.

00:17:52.970 --> 00:18:00.830
Put to death, therefore, what is earthly in you, sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry.

00:18:00.830 --> 00:18:03.470
On account of these, the wrath of God is coming.

00:18:03.470 --> 00:18:06.970
In these, you too once walked, when you were living in them.

00:18:06.970 --> 00:18:11.870
But now you must put them all away, anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth.

00:18:13.170 --> 00:18:23.770
And so, the question here, essentially, given the title of this particular post on the Forum, what does it mean to put to death what is earthly in you?

00:18:23.770 --> 00:18:30.410
And I think really, in a large way, the answer to the question, is there in the verse?

00:18:30.410 --> 00:18:36.430
Because when it speaks about that which is earthly in you, it gives the list of things that are earthly.

00:18:36.430 --> 00:18:38.330
It's not an exhaustive list, of course.

00:18:38.330 --> 00:18:40.650
Seldom are the lists in the New Testament exhaustive.

00:18:40.690 --> 00:18:42.930
They're usually illustrative.

00:18:42.930 --> 00:18:51.330
But sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, covetousness, idolatry, these are the things you are meant to put away.

00:18:51.330 --> 00:19:02.870
And so what it's saying is you have to master the flesh in the sense of the flesh being fallen and trying to pull you away from the things that are good.

00:19:02.870 --> 00:19:12.590
Because the traditional formulation, I used it earlier already in this episode, but the traditional formulation is that you are beset by the world, the flesh, and the devil.

00:19:12.590 --> 00:19:15.550
And you can put those in whichever order you want.

00:19:15.550 --> 00:19:17.690
They're going to differ over time.

00:19:17.690 --> 00:19:20.430
Sometimes you'll be more tempted by the flesh.

00:19:20.430 --> 00:19:24.570
Sometimes you'll be more tempted by the devil, sometimes by the world.

00:19:24.570 --> 00:19:29.870
So, you know, sort of concrete examples, sexual immorality is going to be a temptation of the flesh.

00:19:29.870 --> 00:19:32.050
Pretty obvious on that one.

00:19:32.050 --> 00:19:36.770
When it comes to money, mammon, greed, that's more of a temptation of the world.

00:19:36.770 --> 00:19:38.450
There's a little bit of the flesh in there as well.

00:19:39.530 --> 00:19:45.390
But the other ones here, idolatry, obviously, that's going to be a temptation of the devil to some degree.

00:19:45.390 --> 00:19:49.630
But yes, there's the world as well, because what is the worship of mammon ultimately?

00:19:49.630 --> 00:19:50.430
It's idolatry.

00:19:50.430 --> 00:20:04.870
You've set up another god in your heart, another thing to which you look for all good in your life, and you've made that your god, because the things to which you look for all good are in fact your god, to paraphrase the large catechism.

00:20:06.550 --> 00:20:14.030
And so, when it comes to putting to death the flesh, the things that are earthly in you, it's not that the body is bad.

00:20:14.030 --> 00:20:15.710
Don't ever read it in that way.

00:20:15.710 --> 00:20:18.470
It's not in a gnostic sense.

00:20:18.470 --> 00:20:25.970
It's in the sense of our current flesh is fallen, because in sin did my mother conceive me.

00:20:25.970 --> 00:20:36.690
I'm going to wind up using that verse in almost every episode, seemingly, but our flesh is fallen, because we inherit original sin from our original father Adam.

00:20:36.690 --> 00:20:54.530
It is passed down from generation to generation to generation until the end of this universe, because once we are regenerated in the next life, in paradise, the sinfulness that attaches to this flesh is removed, it's gone.

00:20:54.530 --> 00:20:58.130
We are no longer sinners, and so we will not sin.

00:20:58.870 --> 00:21:11.570
And so, when it comes to this issue of putting to death the things in you that are earthly, it's earthly in the sense of the fallen earth, not earthly in the sense of just fleshly.

00:21:11.570 --> 00:21:16.650
Granted, fleshly can mean either sinful or just of the flesh.

00:21:16.650 --> 00:21:18.890
I'm talking about the latter sense.

00:21:18.890 --> 00:21:23.130
And so, food and drink aren't bad, right?

00:21:23.130 --> 00:21:25.830
Having sex with your spouse, not bad.

00:21:25.830 --> 00:21:28.010
Sexual immorality is bad.

00:21:28.410 --> 00:21:30.330
Drunkenness is bad.

00:21:30.330 --> 00:21:32.790
Gluttony is bad.

00:21:32.790 --> 00:21:34.810
Those are the things that you are putting to death.

00:21:34.810 --> 00:21:39.750
Those are the things that you are disciplining your body to keep it under control.

00:21:40.810 --> 00:21:47.190
So, that's basically the exegesis of that verse, and it really is sort of present there in the verse itself.

00:21:47.190 --> 00:21:51.950
But there's some things on which we can expand to get a fuller sense.

00:21:51.950 --> 00:22:01.370
So, the next question is about the Nicene Creed, really about apostolic succession, but in the light of the Nicene Creed.

00:22:03.530 --> 00:22:06.310
Go back to not having log-offs on the screen, we don't need it there.

00:22:06.310 --> 00:22:09.450
I think everyone knows the Nicene Creed, so I won't pull that one up.

00:22:09.450 --> 00:22:14.870
But, last week you suggested to someone to start their own home church if needed.

00:22:14.870 --> 00:22:17.590
That got me thinking about apostolic succession.

00:22:17.590 --> 00:22:24.010
The Nicene Creed contains the line, we believe in one holy Catholic and apostolic church.

00:22:24.010 --> 00:22:25.550
What does apostolic mean here?

00:22:25.890 --> 00:22:30.370
Being based on the teaching of the apostles, but not successive passing of office.

00:22:30.370 --> 00:22:33.030
And yes, that basically is the sense here.

00:22:33.030 --> 00:22:39.030
The apostolic succession is not the laying on of hands.

00:22:39.030 --> 00:22:51.510
And one of the ways you can actually look at this is, there are instances in the New Testament when the Holy Spirit is received via the laying on of hands.

00:22:51.510 --> 00:22:54.190
And there are instances where that is not the case.

00:22:54.870 --> 00:22:57.710
You can look at one of the cases with a centurion.

00:22:57.710 --> 00:23:03.230
There are a number of centurions in the New Testament, unsurprisingly, for various historical reasons.

00:23:03.230 --> 00:23:10.130
But you have an instance where the Holy Spirit falls on these individuals as they hear the word.

00:23:10.130 --> 00:23:12.030
There's no laying on of hands.

00:23:12.030 --> 00:23:14.690
Now granted, this is not apostolic succession.

00:23:14.690 --> 00:23:17.990
We're not talking about bishops or anything here.

00:23:17.990 --> 00:23:21.550
But it's an important distinction to recognize.

00:23:22.390 --> 00:23:26.650
It is not necessary to have the laying on of hands to receive the Holy Spirit.

00:23:26.650 --> 00:23:32.990
It is not necessary to have the laying on of hands to have apostolic succession.

00:23:32.990 --> 00:23:36.750
Because apostolic succession is a matter of teaching.

00:23:36.750 --> 00:23:45.690
It is a matter of following the doctrine of the apostles, which is to say Christianity, to obey the New Testament, what it teaches.

00:23:45.690 --> 00:23:49.710
Because what is the most important tradition that we have from the apostles?

00:23:49.770 --> 00:23:51.630
Well, it's the New Testament.

00:23:51.630 --> 00:23:59.190
It's the thing that they wrote down under the inspiration of the Spirit and passed on Christianity to us.

00:23:59.190 --> 00:24:02.230
That's what you have to follow to have apostolic succession.

00:24:03.270 --> 00:24:07.370
I know that there are churches, of course, and I'm just going to decline to name them here.

00:24:07.370 --> 00:24:12.090
You all know which ones I mean, because they're the only ones that make the claim.

00:24:13.290 --> 00:24:15.890
Modulo, a couple of exceptions.

00:24:15.890 --> 00:24:23.930
But you have churches that will try to claim that they have a direct line traced back all the way to the apostles.

00:24:23.930 --> 00:24:30.110
And the simple fact of the matter is, there isn't a single church that can actually truthfully make that claim.

00:24:30.110 --> 00:24:41.730
There's a pretty significant gray area where they can kind of argue that maybe this man knew this man and this man knew that man, but not really.

00:24:42.310 --> 00:24:43.690
There's no concrete proof.

00:24:43.690 --> 00:24:44.510
They can't prove it.

00:24:44.510 --> 00:24:46.610
They don't have any proof of it.

00:24:46.610 --> 00:24:54.010
And that's not cause for concern, because apostolic succession is not the laying on of hands.

00:24:54.010 --> 00:24:55.310
It's not the physical.

00:24:55.310 --> 00:25:02.270
The spirit is not transmitted with a physical touch of one man giving another man the backslap.

00:25:02.270 --> 00:25:07.990
And I'm not being dismissive or, you know, dealing with holy things in a light way.

00:25:08.310 --> 00:25:12.530
You can call it the holy backslap, because that's basically what they're trying to argue.

00:25:12.530 --> 00:25:22.110
And now, were it something that were necessary, were this something that were a sacrament instituted by God and necessary to the faith, I would never speak about it in that way.

00:25:22.110 --> 00:25:23.690
But it's not.

00:25:23.690 --> 00:25:29.490
Because, again, what is succession is teaching the doctrine of the apostles.

00:25:30.870 --> 00:25:36.790
Was Paul an apostle before he had hands laid on him?

00:25:36.790 --> 00:25:37.610
The answer is yes.

00:25:38.770 --> 00:25:42.390
Now, of course, there are those who will try to argue, well, it was because he got it from God directly.

00:25:42.390 --> 00:25:44.030
Well, but okay.

00:25:44.030 --> 00:25:48.010
At the very least, we've established the laying on of hands is not necessary.

00:25:49.450 --> 00:25:51.550
That's very clear from scripture.

00:25:51.550 --> 00:25:56.990
Just the same as it's not necessary for receiving the Holy Spirit to have the laying on of hands.

00:25:56.990 --> 00:25:58.350
I'm not saying it's a bad thing.

00:25:58.350 --> 00:26:03.090
There's nothing wrong with it as a tradition, but it's not necessary.

00:26:03.090 --> 00:26:06.290
And so, no, there's nothing wrong with starting up a home church.

00:26:06.370 --> 00:26:14.170
You're not breaking with tradition, and you're not causing problems with the guard to apostolic succession.

00:26:14.170 --> 00:26:20.510
Do bear in mind that most of the early churches were in fact home churches, because they were meeting in secret.

00:26:20.510 --> 00:26:25.670
Sometimes they were literally meeting in the tombs, and not all of them had an apostle present, certainly.

00:26:31.178 --> 00:26:40.338
The next one is sort of shifting gears, I guess, to the political, although also with a religious element still, unsurprisingly.

00:26:41.738 --> 00:26:48.918
You have stated on many occasions that you believe we will win because God has made promises to Japheth, which is true.

00:26:48.918 --> 00:26:56.838
To play devil's advocate, isn't it possible that these promises have already been fulfilled and that we truly are in the last days?

00:26:58.218 --> 00:27:03.878
There are really two questions there, and I'll answer them in order, as it were.

00:27:03.878 --> 00:27:17.478
The first one is whether or not there's a possibility that those promises, and of course, we're speaking about Noah's prophecy, whether or not those promises have been fulfilled.

00:27:17.478 --> 00:27:23.558
The answer is that they have, but not fully, because there's no end point.

00:27:24.778 --> 00:27:28.178
The promise to Japheth is that he will be Christendom.

00:27:28.998 --> 00:27:31.978
He will dwell in the tents of Shem.

00:27:31.978 --> 00:27:41.578
And there's a little bit of hostility there in the actual grammar, if you look at the Greek terms used, and the context, of course.

00:27:41.578 --> 00:27:46.558
But with regard to being Christendom, that is an ongoing promise.

00:27:46.558 --> 00:28:01.038
That is from basically the New Testament era, as soon as the scriptures and the gospel reach Greece, and then spread from there to the rest of the Roman Empire, and then the rest of Europe, of course.

00:28:01.038 --> 00:28:04.198
It's from that point to the end of time.

00:28:04.198 --> 00:28:08.938
And so there's a partial fulfillment, but not the full fulfillment.

00:28:08.938 --> 00:28:10.558
We see this all the time with prophecy.

00:28:10.558 --> 00:28:17.538
There's often either a cyclical fulfillment, or a repeated fulfillment, or a lesser and then a greater.

00:28:17.538 --> 00:28:18.978
That's sort of what we have here.

00:28:18.978 --> 00:28:35.578
There is the major fulfillment, in a sense, with regard to the centuries during which Europe was Christendom and Europe was ascendant, and then there is the not yet fulfilled, with regard to the future.

00:28:35.578 --> 00:28:38.818
Because it is an open-ended promise, an open-ended prophecy.

00:28:38.818 --> 00:28:45.318
There's no end date to it, except for, of course, the expiration date of this universe itself.

00:28:45.318 --> 00:28:49.278
And so, the next question would be, are we in the last days?

00:28:49.278 --> 00:28:53.978
Well, I actually already pointed out in this episode that there are some signs and things that have not been fulfilled yet.

00:28:53.978 --> 00:28:57.398
And so, are we in the last days?

00:28:57.398 --> 00:29:00.858
Maybe, but are we in the ones that are right at the end?

00:29:00.858 --> 00:29:02.838
No, we're not yet.

00:29:02.838 --> 00:29:07.758
Because there are things that must take place before Christ's return.

00:29:07.758 --> 00:29:15.838
Now, there aren't a lot, certainly, if you look at the way that things are going and how many things have been fulfilled.

00:29:15.838 --> 00:29:19.798
But not a lot is still some.

00:29:20.878 --> 00:29:24.738
So, are we in the absolute last days?

00:29:24.738 --> 00:29:25.758
I would say, no.

00:29:25.758 --> 00:29:33.678
And personally, I also don't think this is not necessarily like, you should believe this, or you must believe this.

00:29:33.678 --> 00:29:35.518
It's just my personal belief with regard to this.

00:29:35.518 --> 00:29:38.558
This is take it or leave it, choose whatever you like.

00:29:38.558 --> 00:29:42.098
I don't think that we're in the last days.

00:29:42.098 --> 00:29:44.018
I think we will see a resurgence.

00:29:44.018 --> 00:29:47.738
I think that God is not quite done with this universe yet.

00:29:48.878 --> 00:29:54.378
I could be wrong on that, and I guess we will simply see.

00:29:54.378 --> 00:30:04.498
But as sort of a tangential issue, there are always those who want to discuss, if we're in the last days, is this the tribulation?

00:30:04.498 --> 00:30:06.618
Has Satan been unchained?

00:30:06.618 --> 00:30:09.278
You know, all these related questions.

00:30:09.278 --> 00:30:11.518
And to some degree, it doesn't matter.

00:30:11.518 --> 00:30:16.858
Of course, it matters in the sense that we kind of want to know what the ground rules are right now.

00:30:17.818 --> 00:30:19.738
Is Satan off his leash?

00:30:19.738 --> 00:30:21.978
Is he allowed to do whatever he pleases?

00:30:21.978 --> 00:30:23.238
Are we in the tribulation?

00:30:23.278 --> 00:30:27.398
Are things going to get significantly worse than they already are?

00:30:27.398 --> 00:30:30.398
It would be nice to know those things, certainly.

00:30:30.398 --> 00:30:46.238
But at the same time, the way that I've always pointed out is that just because we aren't in the last days, so say you lived in the 1300s, you're nowhere near the last days, obviously, because we're living in the 2000s.

00:30:46.498 --> 00:30:49.278
And so, they were nowhere near the last days.

00:30:49.278 --> 00:31:00.238
Well, at the same time, they were, because there isn't a man listening to me right now who is more than, at the absolute most, 80 years away from the grave.

00:31:00.238 --> 00:31:06.238
Okay, modulo advances in technology that may be giving you an extra 40 years.

00:31:06.238 --> 00:31:09.918
Maybe, that's pretty optimistic at this point.

00:31:09.918 --> 00:31:14.558
You are close to the end days, because the end days are the final judgment.

00:31:15.198 --> 00:31:18.238
Well, you are close to the final judgment, because you are mortal.

00:31:18.238 --> 00:31:27.158
And so, you should always live as if you are not really far away from the last days, because you personally are not.

00:31:27.158 --> 00:31:37.698
And in a very real sense, it doesn't matter to you, if this universe is close to the last days, because you will always be close to the last days, because again, you are mortal.

00:31:42.858 --> 00:31:45.618
And I do notice there have been a few questions in the chat.

00:31:45.618 --> 00:31:58.458
I don't know that I will necessarily get to those tonight, because I have quite a few questions in my list, as is, but I will note those down and add them to the growing list.

00:31:59.878 --> 00:32:05.198
So, the next question is actually about Bible translation versions.

00:32:05.198 --> 00:32:07.098
This one's a specific version.

00:32:08.438 --> 00:32:13.558
It asks if I have any thoughts on the anointed standard translation.

00:32:13.558 --> 00:32:16.978
And I had actually not seen this one before.

00:32:16.978 --> 00:32:18.858
Apparently, it came out not that long ago.

00:32:18.858 --> 00:32:21.178
I say not that long ago, 30 years.

00:32:21.178 --> 00:32:24.838
But that's not that long in the grand scheme of things.

00:32:24.838 --> 00:32:26.258
Time flies.

00:32:28.058 --> 00:32:30.538
But the question is what I think about it.

00:32:30.538 --> 00:32:32.478
It says that it's not based on the Masoretic.

00:32:33.418 --> 00:32:35.878
It's based on the Septuagint.

00:32:35.878 --> 00:32:46.098
And it's touted as the translation for whites, which I don't like that framing.

00:32:46.098 --> 00:32:55.138
Not because I have a problem necessarily with, you know, tailoring something to a particular group, because if you translate something into German, you're kind of tailoring it to the Germans.

00:32:55.138 --> 00:32:58.478
Same for French and Dutch and Russian and everything else.

00:32:58.478 --> 00:33:04.378
And so in that sense, you are tailoring it to a particular race when you're translating to the language of that race.

00:33:04.378 --> 00:33:11.938
Now in the case of English, English has become the lingua franca, which is a mildly amusing term at this point in history for a number of reasons.

00:33:13.858 --> 00:33:24.958
But if you're translating to English, you're still very much targeting the Anglo-Saxon race, essentially, and our very large diaspora at this point.

00:33:24.958 --> 00:33:28.138
So I went ahead and looked at the version.

00:33:28.138 --> 00:33:30.118
I didn't read a huge chunk of it.

00:33:30.218 --> 00:33:32.898
I read basically a bit of Romans.

00:33:32.898 --> 00:33:35.078
I was not particularly impressed.

00:33:35.078 --> 00:33:47.598
It does some weird things and is very heavy-handed with what is essentially Christian identity, which is not Christian and also gets the identity wrong usually.

00:33:47.598 --> 00:33:50.058
So great deal of irony in that.

00:33:50.058 --> 00:33:51.538
I would not recommend it.

00:33:51.538 --> 00:33:53.438
Don't use it.

00:33:53.438 --> 00:34:04.938
Quite frankly, I don't think there's anything really wrong fundamentally with the ESV or the NASB or the NKJV or any of the others with regard to the New Testament.

00:34:04.938 --> 00:34:09.598
Because obviously in the New Testament, they're based on the Greek because there's nothing else.

00:34:09.598 --> 00:34:10.778
It's only Greek.

00:34:10.778 --> 00:34:12.318
It's only ever been Greek.

00:34:12.318 --> 00:34:16.538
You have crazy people off in the corner arguing that Matthew was originally Hebrew.

00:34:16.538 --> 00:34:18.398
Well, we don't have any transcripts of that.

00:34:18.398 --> 00:34:20.198
We don't have any pieces of papyri.

00:34:20.198 --> 00:34:23.058
We don't have anything because it was and it's written in Greek.

00:34:23.118 --> 00:34:25.998
There's plays on words and things that work only in Greek and not Hebrew.

00:34:25.998 --> 00:34:29.218
But the New Testament is Greek.

00:34:29.218 --> 00:34:32.718
Everyone agrees on that except for some crazy people.

00:34:32.718 --> 00:34:36.518
So all of these translations are based on the Greek in the New Testament.

00:34:36.518 --> 00:34:39.118
So it's just fine to use any of them.

00:34:39.118 --> 00:34:44.018
With the tiny caveats that I've mentioned before, basically the word Gentiles is nonsense.

00:34:44.018 --> 00:34:48.278
And so when you see Gentiles, just read nations.

00:34:48.278 --> 00:34:50.778
Ninety five percent of the time, it means nations.

00:34:51.398 --> 00:34:56.538
Every so often, it means member of the nations or something very close to nations.

00:34:56.538 --> 00:35:03.458
But sometimes it means heathen, which is a word we don't use that much anymore, which just means unbelieving nations.

00:35:03.458 --> 00:35:04.038
That's all it means.

00:35:04.038 --> 00:35:10.858
So just read nations when you see Gentiles, and you basically got there.

00:35:10.878 --> 00:35:23.598
One other thing that I will mention with regard to the New Testament, certain translators play games because they're Judaizers, is really what it comes down to.

00:35:23.598 --> 00:35:37.778
But so, for instance, one of the times when Paul is addressing one of the groups of Jews that want to kill him, it says that he addresses them in the Hebrew language, is what some modern translations say.

00:35:37.778 --> 00:35:42.658
Well, the problem is what it actually says in the Greek is addresses them in the language of the Hebrews.

00:35:44.078 --> 00:35:45.578
This is an important point.

00:35:45.578 --> 00:35:50.718
Those sound exactly the same, and they can be the same in a certain way.

00:35:50.718 --> 00:36:02.918
But what is meant when you say in the language of the Hebrews is the language that is used by the Hebrews at the time, which means Aramaic.

00:36:02.918 --> 00:36:04.638
That's what it's saying.

00:36:04.638 --> 00:36:06.738
We would just say Aramaic.

00:36:06.738 --> 00:36:23.838
But you could look at this, for instance, there are a number of different times down through history where a population has adopted a foreign language and it has become the language of that population, that entire population.

00:36:23.838 --> 00:36:27.518
You can look particularly at the peoples we colonized.

00:36:27.518 --> 00:36:38.438
And so if you were to say, the language of this group is X, it doesn't mean that X is the language that corresponds to that name.

00:36:38.438 --> 00:36:40.798
So, for instance, American.

00:36:42.738 --> 00:36:46.018
We, yes, speak American English, but we speak English.

00:36:46.018 --> 00:36:47.938
We don't speak American.

00:36:47.938 --> 00:36:49.778
We speak English.

00:36:49.778 --> 00:36:56.618
And so you wouldn't say, the language of the Americans, that sounds weird to our ear.

00:36:56.618 --> 00:37:00.158
And so they should not have translated that way, because what they were doing was Judaizing.

00:37:00.158 --> 00:37:04.218
They were trying to imply that he was speaking Hebrew, which he wasn't.

00:37:04.218 --> 00:37:06.098
He was speaking Aramaic.

00:37:06.098 --> 00:37:10.478
So that's one of the only other little nitpicky things that I would say with the translation.

00:37:10.578 --> 00:37:18.638
But other than that, by and large, any modern translation in English of the New Testament is going to be fine.

00:37:18.638 --> 00:37:24.518
The Old Testament is a different matter, but I've gone over that previously, so I won't repeat that here.

00:37:28.258 --> 00:37:31.998
The next question, sort of a practical one.

00:37:31.998 --> 00:37:35.358
How ought men to find good husbands for their daughters?

00:37:35.358 --> 00:37:38.398
That is a load-bearing prepositional phrase, if ever there were one.

00:37:39.198 --> 00:37:42.198
Since sending them to college is so foolish.

00:37:43.338 --> 00:37:50.998
Yes, I'm going to agree, of course, that sending them off to college is incredibly foolish these days, and pretty much always has been.

00:37:50.998 --> 00:37:52.438
It's not advantageous.

00:37:52.438 --> 00:37:59.718
It is designed basically to destroy women, and also the university system in the process.

00:37:59.718 --> 00:38:01.658
Discussion for another time.

00:38:03.298 --> 00:38:08.998
But the question then is, how do you find husbands for your daughters, basically, to keep them out of trouble?

00:38:08.998 --> 00:38:13.478
Because if you marry them off younger, you're going to avoid a lot of the issues.

00:38:13.478 --> 00:38:15.158
Simple fact of the matter.

00:38:16.338 --> 00:38:23.578
I would say, first, you want to look at how God has designed the system to work ideally.

00:38:23.578 --> 00:38:29.078
And we went over this in Stone Choir a little bit, and I've addressed it elsewhere as well.

00:38:29.078 --> 00:38:46.858
But if you look at the way God designed the system, and I'm just going to speak about Europeans at this point, because talking about the third world with all of the inbreeding and other problems is a whole can of worms I just don't want to get into, and it's not relevant, quite frankly, to answering the question for this audience.

00:38:48.818 --> 00:39:00.998
With regard to marriage, you're going to look at the way God has designed the system, and the best indicator we have for that is peak fertility, because children are blessing from the Lord.

00:39:01.778 --> 00:39:12.318
Marriage is partly, not even necessarily primarily, but partly, for the creation of children, the propagation of the species.

00:39:12.318 --> 00:39:15.298
So, what is peak fertility?

00:39:15.298 --> 00:39:21.038
Peak fertility for white populations is essentially third or fourth cousins.

00:39:21.038 --> 00:39:26.058
Now, some people hear third or fourth cousin, and they think, ah, I don't want to marry my relative.

00:39:27.298 --> 00:39:30.598
Okay, your third or fourth cousin is pretty distant.

00:39:31.838 --> 00:39:43.418
I could pull up a chart, I think, but let's see if I have a cousin chart for those who aren't familiar with how this works.

00:39:44.558 --> 00:39:50.578
So, it sounds like, you know, third or fourth cousin is closely related, but it's not.

00:39:50.578 --> 00:40:12.518
When you're talking about problems with consanguinity or inbreeding, whichever term you want to use for that, you're really talking about first cousins, and a lot of places in the Western world have banned first cousin marriage, and we should all ban it, because it is not a good idea, that one is a bad idea.

00:40:12.518 --> 00:40:21.478
But when you get out to third or fourth cousin, you're not talking about any of those problems with being too closely genetically related or anything like that.

00:40:22.898 --> 00:40:36.978
You're talking about the way God has designed it, because you are meant to marry people within your own nation, and by the time you start getting out to a certain number of cousins, you basically out to the edges of your own nation.

00:40:36.978 --> 00:40:47.178
And so you want to look for places where you can find someone who is that level of related to you to be a husband for your daughters.

00:40:48.318 --> 00:40:54.698
Now, historically, the way that that's going to work is that you're going to have...

00:40:54.698 --> 00:41:02.578
This is probably going to be a little bit small on the screen, but I guess I will put a link to it in the show notes.

00:41:03.878 --> 00:41:20.338
But historically, with regard to trying to find a spouse for your daughters, you're going to have a lot of good options because you'll have extended family, you'll have family get-togethers, you'll have all these opportunities in order to find someone who is compatible.

00:41:20.338 --> 00:41:23.118
There's nothing wrong with talking about compatibility.

00:41:23.118 --> 00:41:26.758
Some of that grows over time, but some of it should be there at the beginning.

00:41:26.758 --> 00:41:31.738
You had opportunities to find compatible individuals for your daughters.

00:41:31.738 --> 00:41:34.978
That is somewhat challenging today for a number of reasons.

00:41:34.978 --> 00:41:41.838
One of the chief reasons is that most people have so few children, and so there are simply fewer individuals available.

00:41:42.858 --> 00:41:56.378
And there's also the issue of many of them have gone off to university, and then they have moved away, they've gone out of state, they're 5,000 miles away from their family, they're living in a foreign country, whatever it happens to be.

00:41:56.378 --> 00:41:58.638
That makes things more challenging.

00:41:58.638 --> 00:42:06.018
And so you're going to have to do the best you can with what is available to you.

00:42:06.018 --> 00:42:15.638
Part of that is going to be spending the time, investing the time and the effort in simply having the connections that make it possible to know who is available.

00:42:15.638 --> 00:42:24.178
Just knowing how many men are around who are the right sort of men and the right age.

00:42:24.178 --> 00:42:29.358
The age is, of course, broader for men than women, but part of it is building up those connections.

00:42:29.358 --> 00:42:40.558
This is something that, historically, was one of the duties, as it were, of women, because the women were the ones who kept track of what was going on in the extended family.

00:42:40.558 --> 00:42:48.738
And then the father, of course, was the one who had the veto power, the sign off on, okay, yes, you can marry my daughter, no, you cannot marry my daughter.

00:42:48.738 --> 00:42:51.238
But the women sort of kept track of that.

00:42:51.238 --> 00:42:59.278
That's something that we need to rebuild, because we have allowed it to just completely atrophy, basically to turn to dust.

00:42:59.278 --> 00:43:00.938
It no longer exists in our minds.

00:43:00.938 --> 00:43:05.638
We don't even send holiday cards to people anymore, which seems like such a trivial thing, but it's not.

00:43:06.538 --> 00:43:14.018
It's sort of the bare minimum level of maintaining that relationship with your extended family.

00:43:14.018 --> 00:43:17.558
You should be doing things with them when you can, if they live nearby.

00:43:18.638 --> 00:43:32.818
So, given the challenges that we face, I think the first thing you want to do is identify the potential pool, and then from there, pick the best candidate for your daughters.

00:43:32.818 --> 00:43:37.978
But it's going to take some time and effort in order to identify that pool of men.

00:43:37.978 --> 00:43:46.498
Now, if you can't find someone who's within that ideal window of, you know, third to fifth cousin, whatever it happens to be, it varies a little, one population to the next.

00:43:46.498 --> 00:43:54.338
But if you can't find someone who is within that, just find someone who is of the same nation as you.

00:43:55.358 --> 00:43:55.998
That's fine.

00:43:55.998 --> 00:43:57.838
There's nothing wrong with that.

00:43:57.838 --> 00:44:01.038
And you're going to find plenty of those men around.

00:44:02.958 --> 00:44:04.538
Where are you going to find them?

00:44:04.538 --> 00:44:14.298
Quite frankly, these days, actually, you're probably going to have an easier time finding men than women in the churches, which is a different problem and a different thing to address another time.

00:44:14.298 --> 00:44:24.098
But there are going to be plenty of good men in the churches, in the good churches, particularly now that we have better churches starting up.

00:44:24.098 --> 00:44:41.078
And so those connections are being rebuilt, particularly in the actually proper traditional conservative churches that are now being started up in order to basically rescue people out of the shipwreck that is the mainstream churches, as it were.

00:44:41.078 --> 00:44:43.478
So, there's no easy answer, really.

00:44:43.478 --> 00:44:47.898
There's no just, you know, here's where you find husbands for your daughters.

00:44:49.118 --> 00:44:51.318
That's not the world we live in, unfortunately.

00:44:51.318 --> 00:44:55.878
We face challenges that previous generations never had to face.

00:44:56.598 --> 00:45:00.378
There are fewer children, there are more spread out.

00:45:00.378 --> 00:45:02.038
Many people have delayed marriage.

00:45:02.038 --> 00:45:04.278
There are some very real troubles, very real problems.

00:45:04.278 --> 00:45:12.118
But, with regard to your daughters, the recommendation, the strong recommendation I would still give is marry them off young.

00:45:13.218 --> 00:45:14.338
You're going to avoid a lot of problems.

00:45:14.338 --> 00:45:16.598
Now, when I say young, I'm not saying 16.

00:45:16.598 --> 00:45:20.338
So, for the crazy people, I'm a Western European.

00:45:20.338 --> 00:45:26.318
The average age for marriage for women historically in Western European countries was somewhere between 21 and 24.

00:45:26.318 --> 00:45:37.498
That's what I mean by young, because that is old enough that you don't run into the weirdness of marrying off your teenage daughter.

00:45:37.498 --> 00:45:51.318
And you also will run, you will not run into the problems of having a woman who is in her late 20s, or late 30s, or worse, unmarried.

00:45:51.318 --> 00:45:56.958
Because by the time a woman gets to that age, there are a lot of other problems.

00:45:56.958 --> 00:46:00.898
A topic for another time to get into that one, because that one's sort of long and involved.

00:46:00.898 --> 00:46:12.098
But I think that's sort of the short version of the advice in order to try and find proper Christian husbands for your daughters.

00:46:12.098 --> 00:46:17.938
You aren't going to find perfect men, and your daughters aren't perfect.

00:46:17.938 --> 00:46:20.718
You know that better than any other man on the base of the planet, undoubtedly.

00:46:20.918 --> 00:46:24.178
But, you want to find them good spouses.

00:46:24.178 --> 00:46:26.378
And there are men still available.

00:46:26.378 --> 00:46:28.778
So put in the time and the effort.

00:46:28.778 --> 00:46:29.698
Build up that network.

00:46:29.698 --> 00:46:31.018
Have other people help you.

00:46:31.018 --> 00:46:33.378
It always helps to have more eyes on the problem.

00:46:33.378 --> 00:46:38.818
If you're the only one doing the work, the only one putting in the time, it may seem insurmountable.

00:46:38.818 --> 00:46:42.798
But if you get all of the old ladies at church to help, it's probably going to be a lot easier.

00:46:48.038 --> 00:46:53.078
The question about my favorite tank and words of encouragement to younger men.

00:46:53.078 --> 00:47:03.138
I think I will save both of those for next time simply because they are totally unrelated, as it were, but asked as sub points of a major question.

00:47:04.878 --> 00:47:07.918
What is with the music of the Stone Choir podcast?

00:47:07.918 --> 00:47:11.718
Does it have meaning or is it just crazy, literally synths and sped up hymns?

00:47:11.878 --> 00:47:15.218
It is, in fact, basically that, yes.

00:47:15.218 --> 00:47:17.418
No, I picked them intentionally.

00:47:17.418 --> 00:47:19.338
I did pick them deliberately.

00:47:19.338 --> 00:47:29.898
And the information about the hymns is available on the Stone Choir website under the resources tab, so you can go and look at that.

00:47:29.898 --> 00:47:36.838
But I'm just going to plead that Germans are allowed to resort to electronica.

00:47:36.838 --> 00:47:38.078
That's going to be my answer for that one.

00:47:42.978 --> 00:47:43.778
Drink a little bit of tea.

00:47:49.929 --> 00:47:52.709
The next question, another question about marriage.

00:47:52.709 --> 00:47:59.549
Maybe sensing a theme, unsurprising, given the current challenges of which we're all certainly aware.

00:47:59.549 --> 00:48:03.989
I'm really struggling with how to inform future spouse material on my beliefs.

00:48:03.989 --> 00:48:07.409
The last time I did, it ended in her divorcing me.

00:48:07.409 --> 00:48:14.969
I know that they have zero political opinions with any weight, but issues like not allowing my future children to marry non-whites is a real problem.

00:48:19.029 --> 00:48:37.289
The first sort of initial response to this would be, you don't need to inform your girlfriend, your fiance, your wife, about everything when it comes to politics, because quite frankly, women shouldn't care that much.

00:48:37.289 --> 00:48:40.329
Women should be involved with other things in politics.

00:48:40.429 --> 00:48:58.469
Politics is a man's game, and it is unfortunate how many women are deeply invested in it now, partly because men have abandoned the field, partly because women are doing things they shouldn't be doing, but you just don't need to discuss everything with her.

00:48:59.509 --> 00:49:01.029
You don't.

00:49:01.029 --> 00:49:04.709
Just like you don't need to discuss everything about your job with your wife.

00:49:04.709 --> 00:49:08.669
You can leave some of that stuff at the office, as it were, whatever your office happens to be.

00:49:09.689 --> 00:49:12.849
So, do you need to discuss it with her?

00:49:12.849 --> 00:49:13.869
Maybe think about that.

00:49:13.869 --> 00:49:16.089
Maybe don't bring up every topic with her.

00:49:16.089 --> 00:49:18.409
I'm not saying that you keep things from your wife.

00:49:18.409 --> 00:49:22.769
I know there are some women who will hear what I said and get all up in arms about it.

00:49:22.769 --> 00:49:26.029
Rather, I'm saying there are simply things that do not concern women.

00:49:26.029 --> 00:49:27.569
And so they don't need to hear about them.

00:49:27.569 --> 00:49:29.249
They don't need to know about them.

00:49:29.249 --> 00:49:34.009
If you want to discuss them, discuss them with your male friends.

00:49:34.009 --> 00:50:01.849
So, that addresses sort of the initial part of the question, but then the weightier, the more important part of the question is, really, in essence, how do you manage to get your wife to agree with you on the major important issues so that you don't wind up with some enormous fight in the future over what you want to do with regard to your children?

00:50:01.849 --> 00:50:02.929
And that's a legitimate concern.

00:50:03.629 --> 00:50:07.209
That is important, certainly.

00:50:08.729 --> 00:50:12.149
I think, in part, it's not going to matter.

00:50:12.149 --> 00:50:24.489
And the reason I say that is because there's not that much time left before things are pretty well decided in most Western nations.

00:50:25.769 --> 00:50:43.049
It's going to be very obvious, even to women who are not political and not involved in this stuff, just how bad things are for the white population, and just how things are trending in basically every Western nation.

00:50:43.049 --> 00:50:50.809
And so, you're not going to have to explain it to her, because it's going to be extremely obvious.

00:50:50.809 --> 00:51:15.289
What you want to do is, when she starts to notice those things, and she inevitably will notice some of them, not all of them, but some of them, you want to be there in order to help her through that, in order to help guide her through that, and discuss these things with her, and recommend easily digestible resources.

00:51:15.289 --> 00:51:19.689
Don't hand her, you know, here's Mein Kampf.

00:51:19.689 --> 00:51:21.849
Maybe don't start there.

00:51:21.849 --> 00:51:34.149
But you want to be the one who is there for her when the world looks like it is all going to pieces, because that's one of your roles as a husband.

00:51:34.149 --> 00:51:40.129
Your role as the man is to be the rock, to be the one who is firmly founded.

00:51:40.129 --> 00:51:42.389
You have to make her feel safe.

00:51:42.389 --> 00:51:53.549
And so if you start bringing up issues about how bad the world is and everything is falling apart, and this is terrible, and if you do that, you're going to make her feel insecure and unsafe.

00:51:53.549 --> 00:51:58.769
You're doing the exact opposite of what you're supposed to do as a man.

00:51:58.769 --> 00:52:02.789
That is going to be disastrous for your relationship.

00:52:02.789 --> 00:52:16.169
What you want to do is be the one who has the answers, who can reassure her and tell her there is a right way, there is a correct way to work through these things.

00:52:16.169 --> 00:52:24.309
That's what you want to do, because that's going to give her that security that she needs, and that is going to make her depend on you even more, which is a good thing.

00:52:24.309 --> 00:52:25.609
That's what she should do.

00:52:25.609 --> 00:52:28.649
That's what a wife is supposed to do with regard to her husband.

00:52:29.889 --> 00:52:44.789
So, the overall answer, essentially, is, don't run headlong into this, trying to bring a woman up to speed with everything you believe about politics and society and race and all that stuff.

00:52:44.789 --> 00:52:46.589
That's a recipe for disaster.

00:52:46.589 --> 00:52:50.849
It's not what you're supposed to have in a marriage.

00:52:50.849 --> 00:52:57.549
We have this tendency in the modern world to try and treat a wife as if she's just another male friend.

00:52:58.729 --> 00:53:00.669
Your wife should not be your male friend.

00:53:00.669 --> 00:53:03.029
Your male friends should be your male friends.

00:53:03.029 --> 00:53:06.789
Discuss politics and all of these things with them.

00:53:06.789 --> 00:53:15.509
Go out to the pub, have a beer, discuss politics there, go home, discuss something else with your wife.

00:53:15.509 --> 00:53:33.449
She's not your male friend with whom you discuss these issues, but when she starts to recognize these things, when she starts to have concerns and worries and questions, be there for her to be someone who can answer them in a way that helps make her feel secure.

00:53:33.449 --> 00:53:38.249
You don't have to lie to her, you don't have to tell her that everything's going to be fine, the world is great.

00:53:38.249 --> 00:53:47.929
You can be honest about the state of the world without making her feel like everything has gone completely out of control and is on fire.

00:53:47.929 --> 00:53:53.569
Because again, the last thing you want to do as a man is make a woman feel like she is not secure.

00:53:55.269 --> 00:54:03.109
Now, there's a different relationship there with regard to her feeling like she's in a little bit of danger, but that's a different issue.

00:54:03.109 --> 00:54:07.229
With regard to this stuff, she has to feel like she's secure.

00:54:07.229 --> 00:54:08.349
That's your job.

00:54:08.349 --> 00:54:13.029
So don't run headlong into the wood chipper, basically.

00:54:13.029 --> 00:54:19.869
You're not going to gain anything, she's not going to gain anything, and your marriage is going to suffer.

00:54:19.869 --> 00:54:22.789
So can you bring her along on some of these things?

00:54:22.889 --> 00:54:24.669
Absolutely.

00:54:24.669 --> 00:54:26.769
Do you want to bring her along on all these things?

00:54:26.769 --> 00:54:28.309
Absolutely not.

00:54:29.369 --> 00:54:33.149
I think that's sort of the basic answer to that question there.

00:54:35.209 --> 00:54:41.049
I see a question that I can answer just quickly in the chat caught my eye.

00:54:41.049 --> 00:54:45.149
Do I believe that we are limited to 120 years?

00:54:45.149 --> 00:55:05.769
No, I think that when God says the days of man shall be, and there are a couple of different places it says that, I think that he's basically giving an average for what we are descending down to from what the ancient patriarchs were back when men lived for centuries.

00:55:06.889 --> 00:55:10.569
Obviously, originally Adam in definite lifespan.

00:55:10.569 --> 00:55:15.029
But I think it's saying where things are going to level off.

00:55:15.029 --> 00:55:16.749
It can get worse.

00:55:16.749 --> 00:55:19.049
Look at the, say, Australian Aborigines.

00:55:19.829 --> 00:55:39.389
If you are so genetically degenerate that you have so many problems, such a cumulative mutational load, that you basically can't even hope to get to 85, unless you're some weird outlier fluke, then obviously you've fallen well below that.

00:55:39.389 --> 00:55:46.729
But if you don't have those problems, and you have the medical interventions, and various things like that, yes, I believe we could live much longer.

00:55:48.029 --> 00:55:56.209
I do actually, in fact, think that if we, I'm going to say we could, I'm not saying we should, I'll get to that.

00:55:56.209 --> 00:56:20.229
But if we went sort of wholesale in on the technology to extend life, yes, I think we could achieve something approximating in definite lifespan because insofar as we are aware at this point, there are a number of big hurdles with regard to human longevity.

00:56:20.249 --> 00:56:31.269
One is that the systems for clearing out basically detritus in the brain aren't very good because they're fallen.

00:56:31.269 --> 00:56:36.009
It's not because God designed them poorly, it's because they're fallen and corrupt in a fallen world.

00:56:36.009 --> 00:56:48.969
And so after a while, stuff starts to build up in the brain, causes all sorts of problems, contributing to dementia, Alzheimer's, all sorts of the things that eventually wind up killing us.

00:56:48.969 --> 00:56:51.069
But there's that issue.

00:56:51.069 --> 00:56:57.109
And then the other major one would obviously be the DNA tail, right?

00:56:57.109 --> 00:57:01.389
Because every time our cells replicate, they lose a little bit of that tail.

00:57:01.389 --> 00:57:03.049
It's basically a protective buffer.

00:57:03.949 --> 00:57:08.849
Well, we do actually know how to restore that buffer.

00:57:08.849 --> 00:57:27.649
And so in theory, if we could chain a few things together, a number of different treatments, and we have some ideas how to wash some of the stuff out of the brain too, if we could get to that point, then theoretically, we wouldn't have a biological, which is noteworthy, expiration date.

00:57:27.649 --> 00:57:33.969
I don't think psychologically we can make it much past, like, 150, 180.

00:57:33.969 --> 00:57:41.089
I think modern humanity would just kind of go insane after you've lived much longer than that.

00:57:41.089 --> 00:57:47.829
And perhaps it would be those of higher intelligence would go crazy sooner if you live that long.

00:57:47.829 --> 00:57:48.849
I don't know.

00:57:48.849 --> 00:57:53.789
I might lean that way a little bit, with regard to that being the case.

00:57:54.969 --> 00:57:57.889
So yes, I think we could live longer.

00:57:57.889 --> 00:58:05.149
No, I don't think that we really can, because I think there are psychological limitations that we basically can't overcome.

00:58:05.149 --> 00:58:14.949
Unless you have that sort of person who's just happy to do the exact same thing day in and day out, with no novelty, no change, and no thought.

00:58:14.949 --> 00:58:17.189
That person maybe could live forever.

00:58:17.189 --> 00:58:19.869
But that's a different question.

00:58:19.869 --> 00:58:23.809
So yes, the short answer is I do think that we could biologically live more than 120.

00:58:36.028 --> 00:58:38.908
Let's see, what is the next question here?

00:58:43.128 --> 00:58:56.148
I remember you speaking on how scripture says, when you fast and not if, in a Stone Choir episode, could you consider going into fasting and when and how someone should go about it?

00:58:58.388 --> 00:59:08.608
Fasting is one of those practices that it has both a personal and a corporate dynamic, or an element to it.

00:59:08.608 --> 00:59:19.948
And so, personally fasting is going to be a matter of your own personal practice, your own personal practice of the Christian faith.

00:59:19.948 --> 00:59:34.068
So maybe you pick one day a week where you fast for all the daylight hours of that day, or you fast from evening the day before until evening the next day, or the morning of the day after.

00:59:34.068 --> 00:59:35.708
Or whatever it happens to be.

00:59:35.708 --> 00:59:41.108
Or maybe it's every other week, and you fast for a couple of days.

00:59:41.108 --> 01:00:03.408
The point with regard to fasting is that the time that you would have spent eating, and so if particularly historically, this is more relevant because historically, you spent more time on this because you had to prep everything from scratch after you went out in the garden and collected it and you had to grind your own flour and all these things.

01:00:03.408 --> 01:00:21.268
And so, the amount of time spent on prep plus eating plus clean up was pretty big historically, unless you were a nobleman, of course, in which case you had servants to do that for you, which is effectively what we have today, because you can go to the store and buy food that's pre-made.

01:00:22.688 --> 01:00:29.968
The point is that time that you would have spent doing these things, you dedicate to the things of God.

01:00:29.968 --> 01:00:32.588
That's the point of it being Christian fasting.

01:00:33.408 --> 01:00:38.268
Just abstaining from food isn't necessarily a Christian practice.

01:00:38.268 --> 01:00:40.168
Now, it has health benefits.

01:00:40.168 --> 01:00:50.368
There are very real health benefits of fasting, and the scientific literature has proved that conclusively at this point, and they keep finding other things.

01:00:50.368 --> 01:00:51.988
So, there is that element to it as well.

01:00:51.988 --> 01:00:57.628
There's nothing wrong with doing something because it is good for the body, but also as a spiritual element.

01:00:57.628 --> 01:00:59.208
And that's certainly the case with fasting.

01:01:01.168 --> 01:01:11.568
So, when you fast is going to be a personal decision as part of your personal practice of the Christian faith.

01:01:11.568 --> 01:01:13.648
It is something that you should do.

01:01:13.648 --> 01:01:16.768
It is something that is part of the Christian religion.

01:01:16.768 --> 01:01:19.928
It is not something that is optional even.

01:01:19.928 --> 01:01:22.588
It is absolutely something that you should do.

01:01:23.828 --> 01:01:26.788
Now, the corporate aspect, and I do think this is important.

01:01:26.848 --> 01:01:35.228
I think it is something that we sort of lost along the way in our over reaction to correcting the abuses of Rome.

01:01:37.468 --> 01:01:43.508
I think that having national days of prayer and fasting is a good thing.

01:01:43.508 --> 01:01:45.748
I think we should return to having that.

01:01:45.748 --> 01:01:52.548
I think we should have periods in the calendar when we fast as a nation.

01:01:52.548 --> 01:01:57.308
I think that is something that is absolutely part of being a Christian people.

01:01:57.308 --> 01:02:05.228
Now, I don't think it's the sort of thing where, you know, you eat fish on Friday or something like that.

01:02:05.228 --> 01:02:09.268
I think that's turning it into what is effectively works righteousness.

01:02:10.608 --> 01:02:20.948
That is making it into an observance of a ceremony for the sake of the ceremony, not for the sake of the thing that is the purposes of observing the ceremony.

01:02:21.748 --> 01:02:28.728
So, like I said, you want to do this in order to focus on the things of God.

01:02:28.728 --> 01:02:31.128
You're not fasting just to fast.

01:02:31.128 --> 01:02:32.908
That's not the point.

01:02:32.908 --> 01:02:46.468
When you start having the sort of silly practices like, well, you can't have meat, but fish, fish isn't meat, or even some sillier options in some places down through history, I don't think that that's what we should be doing.

01:02:47.228 --> 01:03:09.068
But if we have, say, a three-day period in the calendar, where, except for, of course, pregnant women and those who are usually accepted from fasting, because we recognize that there's some people who cannot fast, diabetics can't really do the same things as others when it comes to fasting, they should look into some of this stuff, though.

01:03:09.068 --> 01:03:10.928
Tangent.

01:03:10.928 --> 01:03:32.128
But we should have, you know, a three-day period in the calendar where everyone fasts, the entire nation fasts, repents of our sins, and the sins of our fathers, because that is a Christian confession, focuses on the things of God, because God promises to hear when his people humble themselves before him and come to him in prayer.

01:03:32.128 --> 01:03:39.828
Fasting and prayer go together, and so absolutely it should be part of our national practice of the faith, as well as our personal practice.

01:03:41.068 --> 01:03:44.508
But the personal aspect is going to be something that you have to decide.

01:03:45.528 --> 01:03:59.028
And there's nothing wrong with making it match your calendar and your family's calendar and things like that, because certainly if you're married and you have children and things, you're going to have to work this around your family life.

01:03:59.028 --> 01:04:00.628
That's perfectly acceptable as a Christian.

01:04:14.143 --> 01:04:15.163
Well, I can answer this one easily.

01:04:15.163 --> 01:04:17.263
Are you invested in the stock market?

01:04:17.263 --> 01:04:18.463
No.

01:04:18.463 --> 01:04:21.503
So, that's a pretty easy one to answer.

01:04:21.503 --> 01:04:23.543
Nice short answer for that one.

01:04:26.103 --> 01:04:35.683
I think the last question that I will do today, because I believe I'm right, in a little over an hour, I think.

01:04:36.763 --> 01:04:38.403
Modulo that intro.

01:04:40.003 --> 01:04:43.343
What are your thoughts on Memento 70?

01:04:44.023 --> 01:04:52.403
So, I think what I will do is pull that up, and we can look at it a little bit.

01:04:54.523 --> 01:05:01.883
So, Memento 70 is actually quite related to the last question.

01:05:01.883 --> 01:05:08.783
It is a Christian men's group, I guess, as it were.

01:05:09.343 --> 01:05:22.803
I looked at it a little bit before I picked the question for this episode, but I have some serious misgivings about it.

01:05:22.803 --> 01:05:35.303
I don't necessarily have misgivings about the content, because I didn't pay for it, so I don't have access to their various prayers or whatever it is they provide you with, devotional materials.

01:05:36.863 --> 01:05:45.663
I do find it weird that they have a mission statement, and the word Lutheran never appears in it.

01:05:45.663 --> 01:05:48.003
I'm not saying that because I'm a Lutheran.

01:05:48.003 --> 01:05:52.283
I'm saying that because I look at the contributors, and they're all Lutherans.

01:05:54.903 --> 01:06:01.463
I find it a little weird when men are something and sort of hide that in what they're doing.

01:06:01.463 --> 01:06:08.603
Now, obviously, they're clearly admitting to being Lutheran, as it were, in their bios here.

01:06:08.603 --> 01:06:14.083
But not having it in their other materials seems very odd to me.

01:06:14.083 --> 01:06:21.663
Because if they are earnestly Lutheran, then certainly that is going to show up in their teaching.

01:06:21.663 --> 01:06:24.763
And I think they should be upfront about that.

01:06:25.943 --> 01:06:33.663
I also, and I know some men are a little uncomfortable with this, but that's fine because they should be.

01:06:35.423 --> 01:06:39.043
I don't like that they're charging for it.

01:06:39.043 --> 01:06:44.503
I have no problem with these sorts of sites taking donations.

01:06:45.843 --> 01:06:48.183
There's nothing wrong with that.

01:06:48.183 --> 01:06:58.663
I do not like charging for Christian materials, because I don't think they belong to the man, they belong to God, they belong to the church.

01:06:58.663 --> 01:07:11.443
If you are producing something that is consonant with the Word of God, if you are producing something that is theologically and doctrinally sound, you should give that away for free.

01:07:11.443 --> 01:07:18.563
Because regardless of the ability of other men to pay for it, they should have access to it if it is sound.

01:07:18.563 --> 01:07:21.083
If it's not sound, you shouldn't have made it.

01:07:21.083 --> 01:07:27.123
And so, I would just never charge for this sort of thing.

01:07:27.123 --> 01:07:29.203
I don't charge for any of the things that I do.

01:07:29.203 --> 01:07:30.523
I don't charge for this.

01:07:31.303 --> 01:07:35.243
I don't charge for my website.

01:07:35.243 --> 01:07:36.503
I don't charge for any of that stuff.

01:07:36.503 --> 01:07:38.383
Stone Choir is free.

01:07:38.383 --> 01:07:43.103
I know that someone somewhere is going to say, oh, you have a $10 registration free on the forum.

01:07:43.103 --> 01:07:49.403
That's to cut down on spam, because I can't possibly deal with the flood of spam any more than I have.

01:07:49.403 --> 01:07:53.543
And quite frankly, the majority of the questions that I've answered have not been submitted on the forum.

01:07:53.543 --> 01:07:58.463
They've been in the chat or on X or Telegram or various other places.

01:07:58.983 --> 01:08:02.163
And I've sort of collected them as I go.

01:08:02.163 --> 01:08:07.063
But I just don't think that you can charge for these things.

01:08:07.063 --> 01:08:10.083
I think that it is morally wrongful to do so.

01:08:10.083 --> 01:08:15.243
And I would go so far as to say that it includes Christian books.

01:08:15.243 --> 01:08:17.323
They should be released for free.

01:08:17.323 --> 01:08:25.703
You can charge for the print version, because there is a real cost attached to producing the thing, but the PDF should always be free.

01:08:25.703 --> 01:08:27.803
There should be a web version, something like that.

01:08:28.363 --> 01:08:35.983
That should be available, because I just think that it's wrong not to have that be available.

01:08:37.543 --> 01:08:38.903
Because again, it doesn't belong to you.

01:08:38.903 --> 01:08:48.043
I don't know why it randomly decided to change the size of the browser there, but apparently it's just being uncooperative.

01:08:48.043 --> 01:09:00.283
Anyway, another issue that I had when I was looking at it, I noticed that when I pulled up how it works, I'm going to try to get OBS to agree with me and stop changing the size.

01:09:01.603 --> 01:09:18.723
This is in theory something made by American Lutherans, American Christians, aimed at, I believe, American men most likely between the ages of say 20 and 60, right?

01:09:18.723 --> 01:09:20.003
Somewhere in there.

01:09:20.003 --> 01:09:22.103
One of the first issues they talk about is pornography.

01:09:22.243 --> 01:09:24.903
So, you know, obviously younger men.

01:09:24.903 --> 01:09:30.483
OBS is just going to keep changing it, so I can't make my point because I want the picture there.

01:09:30.483 --> 01:09:35.443
They choose to use a black guy as their website image.

01:09:35.443 --> 01:09:38.103
I just find that fundamentally unserious.

01:09:38.103 --> 01:09:42.603
If you're going to target a particular group, show that group in your materials.

01:09:44.383 --> 01:09:53.683
The same sort of thing when I went to buy a new sweater recently, and a bunch of the models for wool sweaters were blacks.

01:09:53.683 --> 01:10:00.823
I have never in my life seen a black man wearing the style of sweater I was trying to buy.

01:10:00.823 --> 01:10:02.183
It's just completely ridiculous.

01:10:02.183 --> 01:10:08.243
It shows not just a sort of fundamental unseriousness with regard to these men, but an evil.

01:10:08.243 --> 01:10:09.823
There's something wicked about it.

01:10:09.823 --> 01:10:12.363
There's something wrong about what they are doing.

01:10:12.363 --> 01:10:15.623
And so, no, I would not recommend this group.

01:10:15.623 --> 01:10:16.723
I cannot recommend this group.

01:10:17.143 --> 01:10:25.623
And I say that, while looking at some of these contributors, and some of these contributors aren't bad men.

01:10:25.623 --> 01:10:28.283
I'm not going to go through and pick out which ones I like and which ones I don't.

01:10:28.283 --> 01:10:29.403
I'm not going to do that here.

01:10:29.403 --> 01:11:04.283
But I am going to say that, given the current state of the LCMS, particularly the pricidium, so called, which is the president and vice presidents, I am not going to recommend anything that has an LCMS president or vice president involved in the project, because thus far I have not seen a single one of them stand up and do anything about the extreme wickedness that is infesting the Lutheran Church in America.

01:11:04.283 --> 01:11:06.563
And they are in a position of authority to do that.

01:11:06.563 --> 01:11:10.163
They are in the position of essentially bishops.

01:11:10.163 --> 01:11:17.483
There's some weirdness because you have president, vice president, and you have district presidents, but at any rate, they have ecclesiastical authority.

01:11:17.483 --> 01:11:19.743
They're going to receive the stricter judgment.

01:11:19.743 --> 01:11:27.023
They haven't done anything to avert the problems, despite being warned repeatedly by many men.

01:11:27.023 --> 01:11:28.843
They continue to cover up problems.

01:11:28.843 --> 01:11:31.663
They continue to permit them to occur.

01:11:31.663 --> 01:11:35.303
And in some cases, they are overseeing them and even causing them.

01:11:35.303 --> 01:11:44.943
And so, no, I can't recommend anything that has any LCMS vice president involved in it, because I don't trust a single one of them.

01:11:46.803 --> 01:11:50.183
Does that mean that the materials they will produce will all be bad?

01:11:50.183 --> 01:11:51.663
No, I don't think so.

01:11:51.663 --> 01:11:54.163
Some of them will undoubtedly be good.

01:11:54.163 --> 01:12:04.643
But, again, they should be available for free if they're sound, because Christian men should not charge for things that belong to God.

01:12:04.643 --> 01:12:07.503
And sound theology, sound doctrine belongs to God.

01:12:10.363 --> 01:12:20.323
This is one of those areas where just because you invested a bunch of time and effort, doesn't mean you get a charge for it.

01:12:20.323 --> 01:12:22.363
You have no right to do that.

01:12:22.363 --> 01:12:40.083
And if you want to charge for your written works, whatever it happens to be, great, go write fiction, go write nonfiction, not theology, not Christian materials, not devotional materials, because those belong to God and to the church.

01:12:40.083 --> 01:12:42.643
And so you do not get to charge for them.

01:12:44.123 --> 01:12:49.383
So if they want to do this and they do a good job, great.

01:12:49.383 --> 01:12:53.103
But they need to drop that introductory fee down to zero dollars a month.

01:12:53.103 --> 01:12:56.863
If men want to donate, fine, so be it.

01:12:56.863 --> 01:12:58.263
And you should.

01:12:58.263 --> 01:13:17.243
If you use the materials from some Christian teacher, you should donate something to that teacher, because scripture is very clear, the workman is worth his wages, and those who teach the gospel, who preach the gospel, should make their living by the gospel.

01:13:17.243 --> 01:13:30.463
That doesn't mean that every man who teaches and preaches needs to be supported by the church at large, as it were, because of course, there are plenty of men who don't do it full time or whatever it happens to be.

01:13:30.463 --> 01:13:34.883
There's some reason they shouldn't, necessarily, be supported fully by the church.

01:13:34.883 --> 01:13:45.083
But at the same time, we've sort of lost this general societal sense of supporting things that need to be supported.

01:13:45.083 --> 01:13:55.083
Historically, many of these things would have been supported by the nobility, who would have been able to retain various individuals, including artists and things like that.

01:13:55.083 --> 01:13:59.083
It's the reason we have the great stained glass in the cathedrals in Europe.

01:13:59.083 --> 01:14:03.543
Those were not crowdfunded, as it were, which is sort of how things work today.

01:14:03.543 --> 01:14:08.543
Those were paid for by kings and electors and great nobles.

01:14:08.543 --> 01:14:16.483
But that's not what we have today, because things are not rightly ordered, and so we have to make do with what we have.

01:14:16.483 --> 01:14:27.563
And part of that is developing a culture, redeveloping a culture, of paying for things when we find them useful, even if there isn't a paywall.

01:14:28.683 --> 01:14:35.983
Just because you didn't have to pay to access it doesn't mean that you shouldn't pay for having had access to it.

01:14:35.983 --> 01:14:39.703
I can think of a particular concrete example.

01:14:39.703 --> 01:14:49.843
There is, fairly close by to where I live here in East Tennessee, a particular driving loop out in the National Park.

01:14:49.843 --> 01:14:52.883
It is called Cades Cove, and it's beautiful.

01:14:52.883 --> 01:15:00.023
If you ever happen to be in the area, and it is not the height of tourist season, you should do the drive.

01:15:00.023 --> 01:15:05.863
If it's the height of tourist season, block out six hours of your day, you might literally be stuck in traffic that long.

01:15:05.863 --> 01:15:08.203
Not the point I'm making, but just a warning.

01:15:09.443 --> 01:15:15.543
At the entrance and the exit, there is a little box where you can give a little bit of money.

01:15:15.543 --> 01:15:20.243
And the reason it's a little box where you can give a little bit of money is because there's absolutely no signal there.

01:15:20.243 --> 01:15:23.243
You will not be able to pay with a credit card or whatever it happens to be.

01:15:23.923 --> 01:15:27.523
There's not going to be Venmo at this point.

01:15:27.523 --> 01:15:35.283
But for those who are visiting the National Park, this one doesn't have an entrance fee.

01:15:35.283 --> 01:15:41.223
There are no fees for anything except for you're supposed to pay for parking, but it's very loosely enforced.

01:15:41.223 --> 01:15:55.483
And so if you drive through this and you enjoy this beautiful scenery and all of the work that has gone into that, because there's a lot of time and effort and expense that goes into maintaining the national parks.

01:15:55.483 --> 01:16:01.903
And so if you enjoyed that, I do think that you have a moral obligation to put something in that box.

01:16:01.903 --> 01:16:05.423
Maybe you can only put $5, so be it.

01:16:05.423 --> 01:16:07.943
There's nothing wrong with putting what you were able to put.

01:16:07.943 --> 01:16:12.443
You can think of the two pennies with the widow in the temple box.

01:16:12.443 --> 01:16:15.363
I'm not saying give everything in which you have to live, of course.

01:16:15.363 --> 01:16:24.263
But we need to support these things, because if we don't support them, what happens to them?

01:16:24.263 --> 01:16:25.063
They get destroyed.

01:16:25.063 --> 01:16:33.263
It's the tragedy of the commons or the tragedy of the anti-commons, depending on the particular workings, in this case, obviously, the commons.

01:16:33.263 --> 01:16:39.523
But if you don't support these things, they don't keep going.

01:16:39.523 --> 01:16:58.903
They don't just fall out of the sky, because with regard to, say, very useful resources, I'm not going to give a particular example, because I'm not going to necessarily endorse anything right now, but if there are good Christian materials being produced, we need to support those Christian authors.

01:16:58.903 --> 01:17:00.983
I think they should give away their work for free.

01:17:00.983 --> 01:17:03.083
I think the PDF should be available.

01:17:03.083 --> 01:17:09.443
Again, you can charge for the physical copy, because there's a real cost attached to producing that thing.

01:17:09.443 --> 01:17:12.243
But you should give away the electronic copy.

01:17:12.243 --> 01:17:33.003
But then men who use those materials, who profit from them, should support the men who created them, because that enables those men to continue making those materials, and it also fulfills the obligation that we have as Christians to support our Christian brothers, particularly those who are teaching and preaching, because Scripture is very clear.

01:17:33.743 --> 01:17:36.643
They are supposed to be supported by other Christians.

01:17:36.643 --> 01:17:41.143
Now, again, if they're doing it part-time, then yes, they should work as well.

01:17:41.143 --> 01:17:42.183
They should do other things as well.

01:17:43.303 --> 01:17:45.623
But we do have that moral obligation.

01:17:46.723 --> 01:18:02.403
And it's something that has simply fallen away in our society for a number of reasons, largely because of the just complete chaos we have today with so-called multiculturalism and all those other problems, because we don't have the societal cohesion that we once had.

01:18:02.403 --> 01:18:06.263
But we can't allow that to destroy our own groups.

01:18:06.263 --> 01:18:19.383
Within our own in-groups, we need to support people, because that is vitally important, because if we don't, we will lose access to the wealth of materials that we have today.

01:18:19.383 --> 01:18:36.223
So I think that sort of both answers the question and goes off on a bit of a tangent, but one that I think that is vitally important to mention, and, you know, it is the giving season, as it were, which I don't think there's anything wrong with the Christmas season being a season of giving.

01:18:37.523 --> 01:18:39.583
Gifts should not be the focus.

01:18:39.583 --> 01:18:41.323
Christ is the focus.

01:18:41.323 --> 01:18:43.103
We're in the season of Advent.

01:18:43.103 --> 01:18:46.863
It's a penitent season, penitential season.

01:18:46.863 --> 01:18:58.623
But there's nothing wrong with having that focus on being charitable, because charity, being charitable, is indeed a Christian virtue, and a very important one.

01:18:58.623 --> 01:19:03.623
Particularly care for the poor and less fortunate, which we should certainly remember this time of year.

01:19:05.183 --> 01:19:19.403
And I guess that's a good way to close out this particular episode, particularly because there will be an episode next week, but it will not be Thursday, because Thursday is Christmas, and you should all be with your families.

01:19:19.403 --> 01:19:26.563
I'll be spending time with my family as well, and you should be doing that instead of asking me questions and listening to me answer them.

01:19:26.563 --> 01:19:37.243
I will be back on Friday, so I will the day after Christmas, instead of Christmas, so it will not be much delayed, but it will be slightly delayed.

01:19:37.243 --> 01:19:54.363
So, thank you for those of you who submitted questions, and for those whose questions I did not answer, I have written them down, I have a list of them, I will get to them as I can in the coming weeks, in the coming months, perhaps, because the list keeps growing rather rapidly.

01:19:54.363 --> 01:20:09.263
But again, thank you for your time, thank you for submitting the questions, and I hope you all have a wonderful evening, a great rest of Advent, not much of it left, but the balance of Advent, and Merry Christmas to all of you.

01:20:09.263 --> 01:20:09.623
God bless.