Transcript: AAC — 05 Mar 2026 (Q&A)

All transcripts are:

  1. Machine generated.
  2. Not checked for errors.
  3. Probably not entirely accurate.
WEBVTT

00:00:03.560 --> 00:00:06.260
It is the 5th of March, 2026.

00:00:06.260 --> 00:00:07.380
I am Corey J.

00:00:07.380 --> 00:00:10.820
Mahler, and this is At Any Cost.

00:00:10.820 --> 00:00:21.560
This is, I believe it is the 19th episode, and just a little bit of housekeeping before I get started in on the questions this week.

00:00:21.560 --> 00:00:23.520
And really, it's just one issue.

00:00:23.520 --> 00:00:31.360
If you are watching this on YouTube, please let me know if it shows any mid-roll ads whatsoever.

00:00:31.360 --> 00:00:33.840
I have tried to disable all of those.

00:00:33.840 --> 00:00:36.400
And so, if it's showing those, it means that there is a problem.

00:00:36.400 --> 00:00:39.400
I don't want any of that going on.

00:00:39.400 --> 00:00:45.640
And I've also tried to disable all of the inappropriate categories on YouTube for advertising.

00:00:45.640 --> 00:00:51.040
You can't just disable all advertising because it wouldn't be a Google company if you could do that.

00:00:51.040 --> 00:00:58.140
But at any rate, please let me know if you encounter something that shouldn't be there, whether it's mid-roll or inappropriate.

00:01:00.480 --> 00:01:04.500
But getting into the questions, I have 13 questions.

00:01:04.500 --> 00:01:07.420
I just kind of like the numbers, so we'll see if I can get through that many.

00:01:07.420 --> 00:01:12.320
It's just what I have in my template for questions for each week.

00:01:12.320 --> 00:01:17.140
The first question is about...

00:01:17.140 --> 00:01:18.900
First question is an easy one.

00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:21.480
When are you releasing your Stone Choir clothing line?

00:01:21.720 --> 00:01:27.320
Shirts with the Hebrew is unknown or something like that would make good conversation starters.

00:01:27.320 --> 00:01:30.400
I do actually agree.

00:01:30.400 --> 00:01:31.820
That would...

00:01:31.820 --> 00:01:34.860
I send it to Woe as well, and we would like that one.

00:01:34.860 --> 00:01:43.320
It would be great fun to have the Hebrew is uncertain, and perhaps even have that in Greek, just as an added bonus.

00:01:43.320 --> 00:01:45.620
We don't have any current plans to do that.

00:01:45.620 --> 00:01:48.040
We're both pretty picky when it comes to these things.

00:01:48.840 --> 00:02:01.180
So, there would be the issue of finding a producer that is of the appropriate quality and things like that, and preferably, you know, an American producer, or at least a European producer, and then all the logistics and such.

00:02:01.580 --> 00:02:03.240
We've talked about things like that.

00:02:03.240 --> 00:02:05.740
We don't have any concrete plans for that.

00:02:05.740 --> 00:02:13.440
But certainly, something like that would be entertaining, and I think that a lot of guys would enjoy wearing something like that.

00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:19.060
I see someone mentioning in the chat that there's a little more artifacting with this shirt.

00:02:19.060 --> 00:02:23.220
I did actually notice that when I started up my own camera.

00:02:23.220 --> 00:02:33.040
For whatever reason, the combination of my beard and this shirt, particularly YouTube's compression algorithm, does not like it.

00:02:33.040 --> 00:02:41.360
And so there may be some weird artifacting, probably like in this area, I would think, because of the lighting in the beard and things interacting.

00:02:41.360 --> 00:02:48.700
The compression algorithm on YouTube has trouble with things that are very fine detail, and this shirt kind of is.

00:02:48.700 --> 00:02:50.060
It's not one...

00:02:50.060 --> 00:02:53.740
It really is a solid color, but it's not because of the kind of fabric that it is.

00:02:53.740 --> 00:02:58.380
So unfortunately, there may be a little bit of weird artifacting from compression.

00:02:58.380 --> 00:03:02.560
But other than that, I hope there are no issues.

00:03:02.560 --> 00:03:05.320
The lavalier mic should be fine in terms of sound quality.

00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:11.140
The next question is about...

00:03:11.140 --> 00:03:12.980
This is question two.

00:03:14.580 --> 00:03:22.220
How do I convince a girlfriend that I would like her to wear dresses or skirts and a head covering as much as possible?

00:03:22.220 --> 00:03:24.060
This is going to be one of those.

00:03:24.060 --> 00:03:28.780
As far as skirts and dresses are concerned, much easier than head coverings.

00:03:28.780 --> 00:03:33.380
Part of this is going to be that women are creatures of herd habit.

00:03:34.540 --> 00:03:39.560
Women don't really like to actually stand out from all of the other women.

00:03:39.560 --> 00:03:50.240
And so it's one of the reasons that if you can get more women in your church, for instance, to wear head coverings, it makes it easier for each additional woman to wear the head covering.

00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:55.520
It's not an excuse for her not to do it, but it's the reality of the thing.

00:03:56.620 --> 00:04:05.260
So if you can get her to wear a head covering at church, that's a great opening step insofar as that is concerned.

00:04:05.260 --> 00:04:11.420
But with dresses and skirts, there's partly the issue that she's not your wife, right?

00:04:11.420 --> 00:04:14.320
So you don't really have authority over her at this point.

00:04:14.320 --> 00:04:16.660
You can't tell her to do anything.

00:04:16.660 --> 00:04:17.960
She's just your girlfriend.

00:04:17.960 --> 00:04:19.880
Her father still has authority over her.

00:04:19.880 --> 00:04:22.300
Her father can tell her to do things.

00:04:22.300 --> 00:04:23.660
She should listen.

00:04:23.660 --> 00:04:27.180
Maybe she won't, given the reality of society we live in these days.

00:04:27.280 --> 00:04:32.800
But you can do things that encourage her to do so.

00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:35.080
One of the things, go shopping with her.

00:04:35.080 --> 00:04:37.460
Tell her you like how the skirt or the dress looks.

00:04:37.460 --> 00:04:41.240
Women respond well to positive reinforcement.

00:04:41.240 --> 00:04:49.200
And women like to have more of that interaction and more of that feedback than men do generally.

00:04:49.200 --> 00:04:52.240
Few men want to hear those things all the time.

00:04:52.240 --> 00:04:55.020
Women want to hear those things all the time.

00:04:55.020 --> 00:04:59.040
Even if she tells you she doesn't want to hear compliments all the time, she still does.

00:04:59.040 --> 00:05:01.080
Because psychologically, she's built to want that.

00:05:01.080 --> 00:05:04.840
That's part of the relationship that you are building with a woman.

00:05:04.840 --> 00:05:15.240
And so, if you do things with her and make comments, positive comments, give her compliments, about the clothing that you like, you're reinforcing that.

00:05:15.240 --> 00:05:19.740
You don't have to say, you always have to wear a dress.

00:05:19.740 --> 00:05:30.920
That's a different sort of thing, because we're talking about what is ideal in society, and that should be something that is enforced with regard to our laws and our culture and our norms.

00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:35.760
That's something that is enforced in a way that you personally don't have complete control over.

00:05:35.760 --> 00:05:39.180
You have some little influence, because every man does.

00:05:39.180 --> 00:05:46.160
And so, for instance, men dressing well when they go to church, that's going to influence other men to some degree.

00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:48.080
Men less than women.

00:05:48.080 --> 00:05:57.640
If the women see that every woman at church wears a dress, you are going to find very few women who are going to rebel against that and say, well, I'm going to wear blue jeans.

00:05:57.640 --> 00:05:59.300
Women don't like to do that typically.

00:05:59.300 --> 00:06:06.880
There's a certain streak of rebelliousness in some women, certainly, but by and large, she's going to follow the herd.

00:06:06.880 --> 00:06:15.620
So, the best thing you can do, because again, you're not her head yet, she's not your wife, is just give her the encouragement to do these things.

00:06:15.620 --> 00:06:21.740
Say you like the dress, say you like the skirt, hopefully an appropriate length skirt and such, and go shopping with her.

00:06:22.340 --> 00:06:28.320
There's nothing wrong with that, maybe it's a little bit of suffering as a man, but you know, you can deal with it.

00:06:28.320 --> 00:06:31.440
Take a sip of tea here before we get to question three.

00:06:35.760 --> 00:06:38.500
Actually, tangentially related to the tea.

00:06:40.820 --> 00:06:43.800
Relatively tangential, but it's about microplastics.

00:06:43.800 --> 00:06:48.260
Question three, what are your tips on protecting oneself from microplastics?

00:06:48.260 --> 00:06:53.520
I have bought some tweezers to handle receipts, and all my underwear is 100% cotton.

00:06:53.520 --> 00:06:55.400
What are some lesser known tips?

00:06:55.400 --> 00:06:57.960
The underwear thing is actually really big.

00:06:57.960 --> 00:07:04.840
And I think a lot of guys underestimate that one, and incidentally, women as well.

00:07:04.840 --> 00:07:09.900
Maybe harder to sell women on that for some reasons, but by all means, get cotton or linen.

00:07:09.900 --> 00:07:11.320
There are some great options out there.

00:07:11.320 --> 00:07:19.560
They aren't necessarily cheap, but if you get, for instance, linen and take good care of it, it'll last you years and years and years.

00:07:20.160 --> 00:07:23.060
So, that's worth doing.

00:07:23.060 --> 00:07:43.220
Now, many of the linen options and, indeed, cotton as well, you're not going to have zero plastic because they will usually have an elastic band, but as long as it is encased in linen or cotton so it's not touching your skin, and you don't put it in the dryer so it doesn't degrade as much, you're fine.

00:07:43.220 --> 00:07:45.840
Is there some marginal exposure there?

00:07:45.840 --> 00:07:46.280
Sure.

00:07:46.280 --> 00:07:49.120
So if you're concerned about that, get one that has drawstrings.

00:07:49.560 --> 00:07:51.160
I'm not aware of any brands that do that.

00:07:51.160 --> 00:07:52.600
I'm sure they're out there.

00:07:52.600 --> 00:07:54.280
Probably easy to find.

00:07:55.820 --> 00:08:02.260
On a more general note, before I get to some basic recommendations for avoiding this stuff, don't go overboard.

00:08:02.260 --> 00:08:06.460
Don't let this sort of become your personality, certainly.

00:08:06.460 --> 00:08:08.980
Don't become neurotic about it.

00:08:08.980 --> 00:08:14.000
Partly because you can't avoid all of the microplastics.

00:08:14.000 --> 00:08:15.200
There's no way to do it.

00:08:15.200 --> 00:08:15.940
It's impossible.

00:08:16.780 --> 00:08:19.700
There are microplastics in just everything.

00:08:19.700 --> 00:08:28.240
It's in the air, it's in the soil, it's everywhere, it's on surfaces you touch, it's on the food you buy at the store, it's in some of the food you buy at the store.

00:08:28.680 --> 00:08:31.860
I'm not telling you these things to make you neurotic about it or worry.

00:08:31.860 --> 00:08:38.460
I'm saying you can't avoid all of it, and so don't make that your goal.

00:08:38.460 --> 00:08:50.460
Make your goal the minimization of the really big, in terms of magnitude, exposures, the bad exposures, which that you can certainly avoid.

00:08:50.460 --> 00:08:56.240
You can, for instance, buy Pyrex storage containers to use in your kitchen.

00:08:56.240 --> 00:08:57.380
They're better.

00:08:57.380 --> 00:08:59.760
They're vastly superior.

00:08:59.760 --> 00:09:04.620
I have replaced most of my plastic ones with Pyrex at this point.

00:09:04.620 --> 00:09:08.800
One thing in particular, I use clarified butter for cooking a lot.

00:09:08.800 --> 00:09:17.220
Plastic has a tendency to get little micro, basically, cuts in it, little openings, where it's very hard to get all the bacteria out.

00:09:17.220 --> 00:09:22.620
Yes, you can run it through your dishwasher, but that increases microplastics because you're exposing it to high temperature.

00:09:22.620 --> 00:09:33.840
But it's harder to sanitize and sterilize plastic, and so things that you want to keep for a long period of time will not keep as long in plastic.

00:09:33.840 --> 00:09:36.800
My Pyrex that I use now for...

00:09:36.800 --> 00:09:38.700
Those who don't know Pyrex is a type of glass.

00:09:39.920 --> 00:09:48.240
The Pyrex that I use for clarified butter, zero problems, keeps for a very long time, great way to go.

00:09:48.240 --> 00:09:49.760
Are they more expensive?

00:09:49.760 --> 00:09:50.920
Yes.

00:09:50.920 --> 00:09:53.740
Are they fragile to some degree?

00:09:53.740 --> 00:09:55.320
I mean, Pyrex is very durable.

00:09:55.320 --> 00:09:57.440
Granted, there are two different kinds of Pyrex.

00:09:57.440 --> 00:10:02.040
I'm not going to get into that now, but are they breakable?

00:10:02.040 --> 00:10:03.280
The answer is yes.

00:10:03.280 --> 00:10:04.760
You can actually break them.

00:10:05.380 --> 00:10:08.960
But they're reasonably durable.

00:10:08.960 --> 00:10:12.400
They're going to last you a lifetime as long as you don't break them.

00:10:12.400 --> 00:10:14.480
But lots of things are breakable.

00:10:14.480 --> 00:10:15.980
You have to be careful with things.

00:10:16.360 --> 00:10:17.760
My tea cup is Pyrex.

00:10:17.760 --> 00:10:18.300
It's glass.

00:10:18.300 --> 00:10:20.440
Like, this is breakable as well.

00:10:20.440 --> 00:10:22.420
I have a lot of glass things on my desk.

00:10:22.420 --> 00:10:24.540
So just because something's breakable doesn't mean it's worse.

00:10:24.540 --> 00:10:26.540
It just is a consideration.

00:10:26.540 --> 00:10:29.100
The inkwells on my desk are glass.

00:10:29.100 --> 00:10:32.260
So that's a good option, because this is something you're putting food in all the time.

00:10:33.100 --> 00:10:36.740
And maybe you're even reheating food in it.

00:10:36.740 --> 00:10:45.860
So, when you mix plastic and heat, you're going to have greater exposure, generally speaking, to microplastics.

00:10:45.860 --> 00:10:49.960
So don't drink water from the plastic bottle that you left in the sun.

00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:55.280
By and large, try to drink water and other things from things that aren't plastic.

00:10:55.300 --> 00:10:56.220
Use glass.

00:10:56.240 --> 00:10:57.880
Use stainless steel.

00:10:57.880 --> 00:10:59.880
Stainless steel is great for a lot of drinks.

00:11:01.080 --> 00:11:01.960
It stays cooler.

00:11:01.960 --> 00:11:04.240
It feels nicer when you're drinking from it.

00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:09.220
So, for instance, if you're living somewhere warm like I am in the south, in the summer, it's nicer to have that.

00:11:09.220 --> 00:11:10.360
You can keep them cool.

00:11:10.360 --> 00:11:12.500
Some of them are insulated.

00:11:12.500 --> 00:11:14.960
I mostly have Hydroflask stuff.

00:11:14.960 --> 00:11:16.700
I'm not necessarily saying go with them.

00:11:16.700 --> 00:11:19.220
I've found their products to be well made.

00:11:19.220 --> 00:11:20.660
I'm not sponsored by them.

00:11:20.660 --> 00:11:22.260
I don't get anything for saying that.

00:11:22.260 --> 00:11:23.940
I just use them and I like them.

00:11:23.940 --> 00:11:26.480
So that's another good way.

00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:29.640
Basically, you're trying to avoid the microplastics.

00:11:29.700 --> 00:11:33.260
You have exposure to, with regard to food and drink.

00:11:33.260 --> 00:11:34.500
It's an easy way to eliminate.

00:11:34.500 --> 00:11:36.780
And then obviously, the clothing issue.

00:11:36.780 --> 00:11:38.580
If you can...

00:11:38.580 --> 00:11:40.060
Underwear, probably the biggest one.

00:11:40.060 --> 00:11:41.880
Socks, another big one.

00:11:41.880 --> 00:11:45.640
You're going to have a very hard time avoiding all plastic and socks.

00:11:45.640 --> 00:11:53.540
And in fact, in some cases, so performance socks for hiking and things like that, you basically will not be able to avoid 100%.

00:11:54.620 --> 00:11:57.820
But you can get something that's 90, 95% not plastic.

00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:01.600
That's better than 100% certainly.

00:12:01.600 --> 00:12:05.540
You're not aiming for perfection, because perfection is sort of a systemic issue.

00:12:05.540 --> 00:12:10.040
Things have to change all up and down the production line.

00:12:10.040 --> 00:12:12.460
You're doing what you can do on your end.

00:12:12.460 --> 00:12:16.620
So replace your underwear with things that aren't plastic.

00:12:16.620 --> 00:12:20.320
Replace your socks with things that are at least mostly not plastic.

00:12:20.320 --> 00:12:24.740
Buy shirts that are made from actual materials instead of plastic.

00:12:26.280 --> 00:12:28.160
You'd be surprised how many things are plastic these days.

00:12:28.160 --> 00:12:28.820
It's unfortunate.

00:12:28.820 --> 00:12:33.380
But these are the sort of steps that you can take in your daily life.

00:12:33.380 --> 00:12:35.920
And they're not that difficult.

00:12:35.920 --> 00:12:41.220
There's going to be a little bit more initial investment, but it pays off in the long term.

00:12:41.220 --> 00:12:45.060
But the fundamental point is just don't get neurotic about it.

00:12:45.060 --> 00:12:50.580
Avoid the things you can, and don't worry about the things you can't avoid, because you can't avoid.

00:12:50.580 --> 00:12:51.500
Worrying will make it better.

00:12:52.640 --> 00:12:59.660
You mentioned labels, and yes, there is microplastic exposure with regard to thermal paper and things like that.

00:12:59.660 --> 00:13:00.560
I don't avoid it 100%.

00:13:01.420 --> 00:13:06.880
If you ordered a Stone Quire Challenge coin or a Confident Faith one, you know that the label is indeed thermal paper.

00:13:06.880 --> 00:13:09.000
I have the label printer right here at my desk.

00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:09.540
I'm looking at it.

00:13:09.540 --> 00:13:19.540
It's out of the camera view, but I use it because the amount of time that I save by using a label printer versus handwriting each label is immense.

00:13:20.200 --> 00:13:22.820
So, is there a trade-off there?

00:13:22.820 --> 00:13:31.160
Yes, there's a trade-off, but I don't think the exposure is necessarily of such a magnitude that I have to be particularly worried about it.

00:13:31.160 --> 00:13:37.340
And by and large, you can avoid touching receipts these days just by paying with a credit card or your phone.

00:13:37.340 --> 00:13:43.040
Use your Apple Pay or your Google Wallet or whatever, and then you have the receipt electronically stored.

00:13:43.040 --> 00:13:47.440
You don't need the paper anyway, unless, of course, you go to CVS, in which case they force you to take the thing.

00:13:49.500 --> 00:14:01.580
So, the next question, let me pull that up, question four, why is the Magdeburg Confession not part of the Book of Concord?

00:14:01.580 --> 00:14:04.340
It seems like it should be.

00:14:04.340 --> 00:14:15.700
And for those who don't know what the Magdeburg Confession is, basically, it is an explanation of the doctrine of the lesser magistrate, which is Christian resistance to wicked rulers, more or less.

00:14:15.860 --> 00:14:20.600
So, it's on the use of force by Christians, but in a particular circumstance.

00:14:20.600 --> 00:14:30.740
It is the Lutheran statement of it, but it is also sort of the earliest full treatment of it with regard to that doctrine, certainly in that way.

00:14:31.760 --> 00:14:34.460
And should it be in the Book of Concord?

00:14:34.460 --> 00:14:54.420
I think it should probably be included in a collection of confessional documents, not necessarily in the Book of Concord itself, because the Book of Concord was meant specifically to deal with theological issues that were in contention between the Lutherans and Rome, and in many cases, the Lutherans and the Reformed.

00:14:54.420 --> 00:15:08.020
Because the reason the Reformed were included, in essence, is because Rome tried to lump Lutherans in with the Reformed, to just say, you're all Protestants, you're all whatever, you're all heretics, is really what they were calling us.

00:15:09.300 --> 00:15:18.800
But we felt that we needed to distinguish what we teach versus what the Reformed teach, because we're not the same, we are not identical, we do not teach the same things.

00:15:18.800 --> 00:15:27.500
But that was the point of the Book of Concord, and then solving some disputes among Lutherans as well, with regard to a couple documents, the formula of Concord.

00:15:27.500 --> 00:15:37.300
But the point was not a full statement of the Christian religion, or a full statement of every facet of doctrine and theology that could ever arise.

00:15:37.300 --> 00:15:46.600
In fact, the authors themselves recognized that there are issues that will need to be addressed in the future by other men, because they're not addressed in the Book of Concord.

00:15:46.600 --> 00:15:49.260
It's not a full statement of all these things.

00:15:49.260 --> 00:15:52.980
And so, it didn't aim to be that, and so it is not that.

00:15:52.980 --> 00:15:55.500
That's why the Magdeburg Confession is not included.

00:15:55.500 --> 00:16:00.940
So, I would say, in a collection of confessional documents, absolutely it should be in there.

00:16:00.940 --> 00:16:06.880
But it's not in the Book of Concord for a number of reasons, just not what the book is, what the confessional book is.

00:16:11.040 --> 00:16:13.220
Question 5.

00:16:16.500 --> 00:16:19.980
How to discern if helping a neighbor is helping an enemy?

00:16:19.980 --> 00:16:23.460
Those whom you come across are your neighbor when you meet them.

00:16:23.460 --> 00:16:29.800
But is it ever appropriate to not help them because doing so is helping someone who seeks to destroy you, whether now or later?

00:16:29.800 --> 00:16:35.980
For example, helping a non-white with workout advice, although it seems that very soon nation will rise against nation.

00:16:37.100 --> 00:16:42.480
This is a difficult question, and part of it is going to be a matter of conscience.

00:16:42.480 --> 00:16:44.340
What is your conscience telling you you need to do?

00:16:44.340 --> 00:16:49.120
God gave you a conscience, you should employ it, you should not ignore it.

00:16:49.120 --> 00:17:00.420
And the question is, can someone, basically the underlying ultimate question here is, can someone who is in physical proximity, who would otherwise be a neighbor, be an enemy instead?

00:17:01.160 --> 00:17:07.760
The answer is obviously yes, because if you're on a battlefield, the guy next to you may very well not be your friend.

00:17:07.760 --> 00:17:16.680
And so, just because someone is physically proximate does not mean that he qualifies as a biblical neighbor to whom you must render aid.

00:17:16.680 --> 00:17:20.660
There are times where he's going to be an enemy and you should not render him aid.

00:17:20.660 --> 00:17:33.200
And so, for instance, if you are going out and feeding the homeless or the less fortunate, those in poverty, those who've lost jobs, the injured, disabled, etc.

00:17:33.200 --> 00:17:40.320
at all, if you are going out and feeding those individuals or otherwise helping them, you should focus on the members of your own nation.

00:17:40.320 --> 00:17:43.640
You should focus on those people who should be here.

00:17:43.640 --> 00:17:50.560
Do not go out and do that with regard to those who should not be here, because they shouldn't be here.

00:17:50.560 --> 00:17:54.640
And their presence here is harmful to the members of your own nation.

00:17:54.640 --> 00:17:59.640
And so, by helping them, you would actually be harming those to whom you owe a higher duty.

00:17:59.640 --> 00:18:11.060
Now, does that mean that you never, under any circumstances, render aid to someone who, under some analysis, is wrongfully in your country?

00:18:11.060 --> 00:18:13.100
I'm going to say no.

00:18:13.100 --> 00:18:25.320
For instance, if you are out boating, right, you're out fishing or something, and you see someone who shouldn't be in this country, and he's drowning, do you throw him a life ring?

00:18:25.320 --> 00:18:26.580
The answer is probably yes.

00:18:26.700 --> 00:18:30.380
You generally do indeed throw him the life ring.

00:18:30.380 --> 00:18:33.200
That's a different sort of thing.

00:18:33.200 --> 00:18:42.040
And I'm not going to say you always, absolutely, in every case have a duty to do so, but generally speaking, you have a duty to render aid under those circumstances.

00:18:42.040 --> 00:18:46.040
And that's always been the understanding, even in European law.

00:18:46.040 --> 00:18:48.660
The US is actually a weird outlier when it comes to that.

00:18:48.660 --> 00:18:53.500
There's sort of no general duty, legal, positive law duty, to render aid in the US.

00:18:54.680 --> 00:19:02.940
Modulo's state differences and distinctives, but that's the general rule in the US for weird historical reasons.

00:19:02.940 --> 00:19:11.700
But insofar as the neighbor in terms of proximity is concerned, no, the person is not always your neighbor in terms of those to whom you owe a duty of aid.

00:19:11.700 --> 00:19:16.860
So, employ the wisdom God has given you, and listen to your conscience.

00:19:16.860 --> 00:19:20.680
There are going to be times where, no, you should not render that sort of aid.

00:19:21.680 --> 00:19:31.760
But, by and large, I just don't think it's going to come up in a practical sense, because all of us are limited in terms of our resources, and particularly just our time.

00:19:31.760 --> 00:19:34.700
Doesn't matter how much money you have, your time's still limited.

00:19:34.700 --> 00:19:38.140
You can only render aid to so many people.

00:19:38.140 --> 00:19:45.740
You are not going to run out of the members of your own nation before you run out of time and resources.

00:19:45.740 --> 00:20:03.560
So, it's just never really going to arise, because you're not going to go, I've helped absolutely everyone in my city, town, whatever it happens to be, belongs here, who is a member of my nation, who is a distant cousin, which is what we're really saying.

00:20:03.560 --> 00:20:08.220
I've helped all of them, and I still have 10 hours left in my day and a bunch of money left over.

00:20:08.220 --> 00:20:20.600
That's just never going to happen, because there are more men and women and children who need aid than we can possibly aid and then have leftover time to do other things.

00:20:20.600 --> 00:20:34.700
If we were in a situation where everything was going perfectly for our own people, and everything was in order in our country, and we didn't have any of these problems, and we just had abundant resources left over, then by all means, yes, we can aid other people.

00:20:34.700 --> 00:20:36.880
But we're not there and we're nowhere near there.

00:20:36.880 --> 00:20:39.200
So that's a discussion for at some point in the future.

00:20:43.020 --> 00:20:45.440
I do see the questions that have popped up in the chat.

00:20:45.440 --> 00:20:47.660
I've added a few of them to my growing list.

00:20:47.660 --> 00:20:55.420
I don't know that I'll get to them tonight just because, well, time constraints tying into that question I just answered.

00:20:57.200 --> 00:20:58.500
Question six.

00:20:58.500 --> 00:21:03.820
I'm pulling questions from the X thread at this point.

00:21:03.820 --> 00:21:10.180
Do you think godly white men with families are under any guilt for not unleashing violence at the evils we face?

00:21:10.180 --> 00:21:18.120
Would it be even worse to essentially abandon our families for a quick victory over not doing certain things?

00:21:18.120 --> 00:21:21.880
I'll not read certain of the words in the question because...

00:21:21.880 --> 00:21:24.480
obvious.

00:21:24.480 --> 00:21:30.140
The initial response to this is that we did an episode of Stone Choir specifically on this.

00:21:30.140 --> 00:21:32.940
We did the episode on violence.

00:21:32.940 --> 00:21:33.560
That's the title.

00:21:34.360 --> 00:21:50.120
And I will go ahead and link that in the show notes because that is my initial recommendation with regard to this issue because obviously I agree with everything we said in that episode.

00:21:50.120 --> 00:21:54.820
But the question is essentially broader, when is violence warranted?

00:21:54.820 --> 00:21:59.880
And the Christian answer cannot be never because there are times when God requires it.

00:22:00.580 --> 00:22:06.240
And so, this is a matter of wisdom as many matters are.

00:22:06.240 --> 00:22:11.040
And generally speaking, going out and committing random acts of violence is deeply unwise.

00:22:11.040 --> 00:22:12.920
I'm obviously going to say, don't do that.

00:22:12.920 --> 00:22:14.940
Do not go out and commit random acts of violence.

00:22:14.940 --> 00:22:19.240
It's just going to ultimately harm you and your family and make a mess.

00:22:19.240 --> 00:22:20.940
Don't do that.

00:22:20.940 --> 00:22:26.140
This also ties back in to the issue earlier of the Magdeburg Confession and the Lesser Magistrate.

00:22:26.380 --> 00:22:34.720
The question is, when does the duty to wield the sword devolve to the common man?

00:22:34.720 --> 00:22:42.180
Because the Lesser Magistrate is the Magistrate who is lesser than the one who is causing some evil.

00:22:42.180 --> 00:23:03.880
And so, in our system, I'll just use our system, even our system, as a giant mess, if the president is doing something deeply wicked, in theory, the governor has a duty to protect the people of his state from the president, the governor being the Lesser Magistrate, regardless of what people want about states' rights and such.

00:23:03.880 --> 00:23:05.960
That's how it works today.

00:23:05.960 --> 00:23:08.400
Historical issues are another matter.

00:23:08.400 --> 00:23:11.280
He's the Lesser Magistrate, but what if he's wicked?

00:23:11.280 --> 00:23:13.380
Well, then you have mayors, right?

00:23:13.380 --> 00:23:16.080
That's sort of the next step down in our system.

00:23:16.080 --> 00:23:21.240
Maybe it's the county mayor instead of the city mayor, but if it's a big city, it's the city mayor, right?

00:23:21.240 --> 00:23:26.980
So if you're talking about California, it would be the mayor of San Francisco and the mayor of Los Angeles.

00:23:26.980 --> 00:23:30.260
Not going to be good men in this case, but that's how it falls.

00:23:30.260 --> 00:23:32.840
And the question is, what happens after that?

00:23:32.840 --> 00:23:34.260
And it keeps devolving downward.

00:23:34.260 --> 00:23:43.000
But if all of the men in this list are wicked, at some point it devolves to the common man, just the Christian man who's the head of the household.

00:23:43.000 --> 00:23:50.020
And as we said in that episode, you do have a duty to protect those who are entrusted to your care.

00:23:50.020 --> 00:23:52.800
That is the key there, though.

00:23:52.800 --> 00:23:56.540
You owe them the highest duty, because God has given them into your care.

00:23:56.540 --> 00:24:03.540
And so, your wife and your children, your extended family, you owe these individuals the highest duty of care.

00:24:03.540 --> 00:24:09.880
And so, you should not do things that jeopardize your ability to care for them.

00:24:09.880 --> 00:24:19.960
Does that mean that a man can never go out and risk his life and his ability, obviously, attendant with his life, to provide for these individuals?

00:24:19.960 --> 00:24:26.200
The answer is no, because if the answer were yes, it would always be wrong to be a soldier.

00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:30.120
And there are times where it is incumbent on men to be soldiers.

00:24:30.120 --> 00:25:00.620
But this is, Nat pestering me here, this is a matter of wisdom, and it is also a matter of leadership, which is severely lacking right now in our case, because someone has to have that duty to stand up and act as the lesser magistrate, telling the higher magistrate, he's wicked, and that if you are not going to stop, we are going to do whatever is necessary to stop you.

00:25:02.320 --> 00:25:04.760
I think we probably are at that point.

00:25:04.760 --> 00:25:10.560
We just lack the structure and the leadership and the organization to do that properly.

00:25:10.560 --> 00:25:13.160
Again, don't go out and commit random acts of violence.

00:25:13.160 --> 00:25:13.740
Don't do that.

00:25:13.740 --> 00:25:14.860
That is deeply unwise.

00:25:14.860 --> 00:25:16.600
It's just going to cause trouble for everyone.

00:25:17.600 --> 00:25:30.020
But, no, that's not something that Christians can say is simply morally prohibited in all cases, because it would be to accuse God of evil, and it would be to accuse God of sin with regard to the things He commands us.

00:25:31.280 --> 00:25:38.040
So, it is, again, at risk of ad nauseam, I guess, but it is a matter of wisdom.

00:25:38.040 --> 00:25:44.980
But, no, there is not sort of a generalized guilt for not going out and doing something on your own.

00:25:45.840 --> 00:26:06.460
But, is there a sort of higher level, more generalized, in another sense, guilt among those of us who, using the broad sense of the pronoun there, those of us who could have done something, so mostly past generations, right?

00:26:06.460 --> 00:26:12.440
At this point, it's kind of falling on us as well, because now we're in sort of their shoes where they should have acted.

00:26:12.440 --> 00:26:14.520
Do they bear moral guilt for their failure to act?

00:26:14.580 --> 00:26:16.200
The answer is yes.

00:26:16.200 --> 00:26:28.700
But there is a difference among men even, because there are men to whom God has given the skills to lead these sorts of things, they will bear a greater guilt if they do not act.

00:26:28.700 --> 00:26:40.080
The common man who is just going through his day and going to work and providing for his family, he doesn't have the duty to stand up and say, I'm the leader now, everyone follow me, grab your pitchfork, right?

00:26:40.080 --> 00:26:41.640
That's absurd.

00:26:41.640 --> 00:26:42.680
That's anarchy.

00:26:43.480 --> 00:26:47.900
It's not how it works, and it's egalitarian as well, so it's wrong on every possible level.

00:26:49.140 --> 00:26:53.200
But there are men to whom God has given the necessary skill set to do these things.

00:26:53.200 --> 00:27:01.440
If they do not act, God will have some questions for them as to why they did not, because that is a moral failing.

00:27:01.440 --> 00:27:07.300
But I would say go and listen to the episode, go into it in greater depth there for some obvious reasons.

00:27:10.880 --> 00:27:15.600
Question seven is a transition here.

00:27:15.600 --> 00:27:18.580
What do you believe hell is?

00:27:18.580 --> 00:27:25.440
There are a number of different ways I could take this question, and a number of different answers I could give then.

00:27:25.440 --> 00:27:28.640
But hell is eternal conscious torment.

00:27:28.640 --> 00:27:37.860
That is the short answer, and that is the term that many who argue for annihilationism or some other heretical position.

00:27:37.860 --> 00:27:42.600
It's the one they try to say, well, you're just this, and that's the epithet they give.

00:27:42.600 --> 00:27:45.360
But it's true, because that's what hell is.

00:27:45.360 --> 00:27:48.560
It is a fire that does not consume.

00:27:50.120 --> 00:27:52.140
It is eternal torment.

00:27:52.140 --> 00:27:58.940
Hell is not somewhere you want to go, and scripture is abundantly clear that it is eternal.

00:27:58.940 --> 00:28:03.720
If you just read the passages that talk about hell, it is clear that it does not end.

00:28:04.000 --> 00:28:05.260
There is no escape.

00:28:05.260 --> 00:28:07.220
There is no way out.

00:28:07.220 --> 00:28:09.720
Hell is eternal torment.

00:28:09.720 --> 00:28:19.480
Prepared for the devil and his fallen angels, but those men who reject Christ will join them, completely and utterly foolish.

00:28:19.480 --> 00:28:27.800
But to explain a little bit of the theology, the reason that hell is eternal is because the debt of sin is infinite.

00:28:27.800 --> 00:28:42.160
You being finite can never pay an infinite sum, and so you will be there forever, because the infinitude, right, the infinite has to be somewhere in that equation.

00:28:42.160 --> 00:28:49.980
And the equation, of course, if you're talking about something paid, in this case is going to be time versus value.

00:28:49.980 --> 00:28:58.480
So nothing you can do as a finite is of infinite value, and so the time is the one that has to be infinite in your case.

00:28:59.520 --> 00:29:05.880
Christ was able to pay the infinite debt of sin because the value of his sacrifice was infinite.

00:29:05.880 --> 00:29:10.280
So he didn't have to suffer forever from the eternity past, right?

00:29:10.280 --> 00:29:15.580
The value of his sacrifice was infinite, and that's paid for the infinite debt of sin.

00:29:15.580 --> 00:29:25.240
And so those who are in Christ are covered by Christ's payment and declared innocent, declared not guilty.

00:29:26.020 --> 00:29:31.080
And so that's what salvation is, that's what forgiveness is.

00:29:31.080 --> 00:29:38.940
Those in hell have had their sins forgiven because Christ atoned for all sins, he atoned for all creation.

00:29:38.940 --> 00:29:46.200
They just rejected it, and so they're trying to pay the infinite debt themselves, and they will be there forever doing that.

00:29:49.140 --> 00:29:51.020
Question eight.

00:29:51.020 --> 00:30:05.820
In light of the increased discourse surrounding interracial marriage, there has generally been considerable neglect for people in such marriages with children who have come under new convictions and are unsure on how to navigate going forward.

00:30:05.820 --> 00:30:07.520
What advice would you give them?

00:30:07.520 --> 00:30:10.580
Of course, this is a difficult position, right?

00:30:10.580 --> 00:30:38.860
If you find yourself in the position where you believe that you did something that was sinful or unwise, not necessarily both, but if you did something that was sinful or unwise, and now you recognize that you would have done something else if you had known better at the time, but because of the reality of what you did, you are now stuck with the consequences, that's a difficult position in which to find yourself.

00:30:38.860 --> 00:30:42.340
But at the same time, it's the position in which every single man finds himself.

00:30:43.340 --> 00:30:45.740
And not just in the personal case, right?

00:30:45.740 --> 00:30:52.460
We've all done stupid things at some point, and had at least consequences that lasted for a little while.

00:30:52.460 --> 00:30:53.780
It could even be something trivial, right?

00:30:53.780 --> 00:31:03.640
Every man listening to this can go, well, that scar is from the time I did X, and this one's from when, right, you did something stupid, and you have a scar to prove it.

00:31:03.640 --> 00:31:05.960
Well, that scar is a consequence, and you can't get rid of it.

00:31:05.960 --> 00:31:09.840
Yes, I mean, these days, obviously, there's plastic surgery and things, but let's say it's more extreme.

00:31:09.840 --> 00:31:14.840
You're a woodworker, and you're missing a finger like most woodworkers are, right?

00:31:14.840 --> 00:31:17.940
That's a consequence of something you shouldn't have done.

00:31:17.940 --> 00:31:24.420
In that case, it's something probably stupid that you did, which marrying outside your race can be stupid.

00:31:24.420 --> 00:31:25.900
In many cases, it is.

00:31:25.900 --> 00:31:32.400
And so, you have the consequences to speak broadly, not necessarily just in a pejorative sense, right?

00:31:32.400 --> 00:31:43.160
Children are also a consequence of marriage, in the sense of they are consequent to marriage, and they are a natural outcome of the exercise of marriage.

00:31:44.240 --> 00:31:56.880
So, what I have always recommended all along is, the children who are half one thing and half something else are going to have to choose.

00:31:56.880 --> 00:31:59.360
Someone said, volume dropped on X.

00:31:59.360 --> 00:32:02.960
Did the, tell me in the chat, did the volume drop or did it drop?

00:32:02.960 --> 00:32:05.480
Which is to say, did it decrease or did it disappear?

00:32:06.500 --> 00:32:13.200
Because I would hope it didn't disappear, there are still people who are clearly listening, because they're not saying that they can't hear me.

00:32:14.860 --> 00:32:18.280
But, my levels show fine.

00:32:18.280 --> 00:32:25.080
The issue for those children is that they are torn between two worlds, right?

00:32:25.080 --> 00:32:29.640
They do not have what all of us have, what I pointed out before.

00:32:29.640 --> 00:32:37.780
I didn't have to choose if I were, you know, American or something else, because I am American.

00:32:37.780 --> 00:32:39.240
That's just what I am.

00:32:39.240 --> 00:32:52.960
Yes, I'm also German, because obviously I am German biologically, and a little bit of Scottish, but I didn't have to choose what I am, because I'm not multiple things.

00:32:52.960 --> 00:32:54.860
And the Scottish and the Germans are cousins.

00:32:54.860 --> 00:32:59.980
They're not as close as, say, the Scottish and the Dutch, but they're close enough that I'm not torn between two worlds, right?

00:32:59.980 --> 00:33:02.800
I don't have to choose if I want Haggis or Weisswurst.

00:33:02.800 --> 00:33:05.780
That's not a big life choice.

00:33:05.780 --> 00:33:08.060
They're both good, incidentally.

00:33:08.060 --> 00:33:09.800
The Weisswurst is better.

00:33:09.800 --> 00:33:16.880
But if you are split between two vastly different cultures, that's a more difficult thing.

00:33:16.880 --> 00:33:19.320
So, you know, you can pick any example of this.

00:33:19.320 --> 00:33:21.580
Just pick any two peoples that are far apart, right?

00:33:21.580 --> 00:33:29.500
If you're half Korean and half Ugandan, you're going to feel torn between those two worlds, because those cultures are not the same.

00:33:29.500 --> 00:33:30.720
They're not even compatible.

00:33:31.180 --> 00:33:33.000
They're wildly different.

00:33:33.000 --> 00:33:36.660
And so, those children are going to have to choose.

00:33:36.660 --> 00:33:41.580
And then the question, of course, is, well, how do they choose, right?

00:33:41.580 --> 00:33:44.180
How do you choose which one you are?

00:33:44.180 --> 00:33:58.040
Generally speaking, you are going to choose your father, because your father is your head, until you are, of course, of age, as a man, in case you're your own head, and then if you're a woman, your husband, right?

00:33:58.980 --> 00:34:02.980
But you're still going to be torn between those two worlds.

00:34:02.980 --> 00:34:12.280
Generally, you choose your father's side and go with that, and you're making a conscious decision in a way that other men do not.

00:34:12.280 --> 00:34:28.920
There is a burden there, and those who are of mixed ancestry know that, they recognize it, and quite frankly, a lot of times, I've heard from them, they don't like being patronized by these supposed Christians and others and say, oh no, it's perfectly fine, there's no difference, and everything is great, and it doesn't cause problems.

00:34:28.920 --> 00:34:36.160
Because they know that's a lie, because they've lived it, because they personally experience it every single day.

00:34:36.160 --> 00:34:40.840
It's one of the reasons that I and others oppose it, because it's deeply unwise.

00:34:40.840 --> 00:34:47.200
It places a burden on your society, it places a burden on your family, and it places an immense burden on your children.

00:34:47.200 --> 00:34:51.340
And there are things that are so unwise, they become sin.

00:34:51.340 --> 00:34:53.840
It's not always sin, it is sometimes sin.

00:34:54.580 --> 00:35:02.240
And I have another recording I did, one of the archival episodes of this show actually, on interracial marriage.

00:35:02.240 --> 00:35:04.580
I will link that in the show notes.

00:35:04.580 --> 00:35:08.600
I would say listen to that as well, because I go into it a little bit more.

00:35:08.600 --> 00:35:11.780
But insofar as the children are concerned, they have to choose.

00:35:11.780 --> 00:35:18.040
And it's going to depend on the mixture as to what your viable options are, right?

00:35:18.040 --> 00:35:27.620
You have a much harder decision to make if you're Korean and Ugandan, versus if you are Russian and British.

00:35:27.620 --> 00:35:29.440
You still have to choose.

00:35:29.440 --> 00:35:47.340
But that's not as hard of a choice, because two European peoples, even though in this case they are opposite sides of one of the great divides in Europe, the great divides being West, East, and South, it's not as big of a difference as if you're crossing the lines of the great races descended from the sons of Noah.

00:35:47.340 --> 00:35:58.940
So if you are half African and half European, that is more difficult than if you are half East European and half West European, or half Japanese, half Korean.

00:35:58.940 --> 00:36:00.060
Do you still have to choose?

00:36:00.060 --> 00:36:00.860
Yes.

00:36:00.860 --> 00:36:02.180
Is there a distinction there?

00:36:02.180 --> 00:36:02.540
Yes.

00:36:02.540 --> 00:36:07.220
Are you going to have a little bit of tension, particularly some historical tensions in some cases?

00:36:07.220 --> 00:36:09.180
Absolutely yes.

00:36:09.180 --> 00:36:17.600
But the best thing you can do is be deliberate about what you are doing, choose the one side, and go all in on that.

00:36:18.380 --> 00:36:25.500
Because it is the best thing you can do with the circumstances that are inescapable at that point.

00:36:25.500 --> 00:36:30.260
And as far as the marriage is concerned, obviously divorce is not permissible, except in cases of adultery.

00:36:30.260 --> 00:36:34.300
So the Christian answer on that one is quite easy.

00:36:34.300 --> 00:36:41.900
But the reality is that yes, it causes problems, and it is going to be difficult regardless of the decision you make.

00:36:41.900 --> 00:36:55.420
In many cases, it will be a matter not for the individual, but a matter of future laws in any given country, because if countries start enforcing scriptural morality, there will be laws regarding these things.

00:36:55.420 --> 00:36:59.940
And so part of it will be, you have to pick the option that's open to you at the time.

00:36:59.940 --> 00:37:03.820
But again, that comes down to the mixture and various things like that.

00:37:03.820 --> 00:37:06.400
It's a fact-specific inquiry.

00:37:06.400 --> 00:37:11.460
It's not a general rule, other than the general rule of, you know, side with your father when you can.

00:37:12.780 --> 00:37:20.500
But go and listen to the other episode I recorded on that, because I go into a little bit greater depth, and I think that's probably a good starting place.

00:37:26.020 --> 00:37:32.980
And I guess before I move on to the next question, I have had people basically ask me to draw up essentially Nuremberg Laws 2.0.

00:37:32.980 --> 00:37:40.120
I don't know that I'll do that, because I don't know how helpful that would be, at least at this time.

00:37:40.120 --> 00:37:49.220
And also, I don't know that we're really going to ever wind up with that sort of law being enacted in that way.

00:37:49.220 --> 00:37:56.160
I think it might wind up being a little more hodgepodge just because of the reality of the mess we've made for ourselves.

00:37:56.160 --> 00:38:00.840
But I don't have any current intention to drop those laws.

00:38:00.840 --> 00:38:02.700
Hypothetical, obviously, not real.

00:38:02.700 --> 00:38:04.920
I don't have the power to drop the real ones.

00:38:06.260 --> 00:38:07.400
Question nine.

00:38:07.400 --> 00:38:14.540
Where in scripture do people, mostly boomer generation, feel they can justify war as we are currently seeing?

00:38:15.600 --> 00:38:19.820
And how do those passages need to be properly interpreted?

00:38:19.820 --> 00:38:23.360
Whenever it's brought up to parents, I get the, it's in the Bible.

00:38:25.880 --> 00:38:29.200
This one obviously relates to Iran and Israel and things like that.

00:38:29.200 --> 00:38:38.360
So the basic question for those who are not reading into it what is actually being asked here, is war morally permissible?

00:38:38.360 --> 00:38:44.880
The answer is yes, because just war is morally permissible.

00:38:45.980 --> 00:38:53.680
So, but it has to be a just war, you know, a war of aggression because you just feel like killing people is not morally permissible.

00:38:53.680 --> 00:38:57.700
That would be a violation of the moral law, you're not permitted to do that.

00:38:57.700 --> 00:39:13.720
This war, and most of the wars related to Israel and the Jews, you have those who are dispensationalist or dispensationalist adjacent, and I just put them all under the umbrella of dispensationalist, because that's where they belong, other than in jail.

00:39:13.720 --> 00:39:16.560
They all believe that this is a fulfillment of prophecy.

00:39:17.600 --> 00:39:25.340
The problem is, you ask them what prophecy, and 90% of the time, they don't have an answer.

00:39:25.340 --> 00:39:34.740
Some of the time, they just vaguely point, hey, Revelation, great, what verse, what part of Revelation is involved here?

00:39:34.740 --> 00:39:44.300
Because as far as I'm concerned, it looks a lot more like Israel is Babylon, the great, the whore in Revelation, than anything related to God.

00:39:45.920 --> 00:39:49.940
I'm not saying that it is, in that case, I'm saying it looks more like that.

00:39:49.940 --> 00:39:57.940
But they can't actually point to any sections of Scripture, any prophecies that actually make any sense here.

00:39:57.940 --> 00:40:00.720
It's always wild misapplication.

00:40:00.720 --> 00:40:07.380
They'll interpret things like the passages about the sting of hornets, and they'll say, oh, well, that's Apache helicopters.

00:40:08.740 --> 00:40:10.280
This is schizo level insanity.

00:40:10.280 --> 00:40:12.220
This is not something that should be taken seriously.

00:40:12.840 --> 00:40:26.540
But the problem is, they've heard it so many times over so many years from so many different sources that you are going to find it very typical to break through that programming, because they read Left Behind, or they watched it.

00:40:26.540 --> 00:40:27.900
I think there was a television series.

00:40:28.340 --> 00:40:29.900
I don't remember.

00:40:29.900 --> 00:40:34.080
They've read other various fiction dealing with dispensationalist ideas.

00:40:34.080 --> 00:40:43.260
They have listened to various heretical pastors saying that Israel is somehow some important part of the end times.

00:40:44.800 --> 00:40:47.940
It's very difficult to break through that level of programming.

00:40:47.940 --> 00:40:55.300
And as I've said before, to those who have particularly boomer parents, so millennials, just don't raise the issue.

00:40:55.300 --> 00:40:56.740
You're never going to get anywhere.

00:40:56.740 --> 00:41:01.360
It's going to give you a headache and be a nightmare and cause strife in your family.

00:41:01.360 --> 00:41:02.260
Just don't do it.

00:41:02.260 --> 00:41:04.120
Don't open the can of worms.

00:41:05.420 --> 00:41:09.720
If it comes up, speak the truth as best you can.

00:41:10.100 --> 00:41:17.100
Don't necessarily be abrasive with regard to the truth, because as family, it's a different sort of thing.

00:41:17.100 --> 00:41:18.720
If it's a stranger, it's a different thing.

00:41:18.720 --> 00:41:21.200
You obviously owe a different duty to a stranger.

00:41:21.200 --> 00:41:26.340
But insofar as these passages are concerned, it would depend on the passage.

00:41:26.340 --> 00:41:28.620
I have to know what on earth they're arguing.

00:41:28.620 --> 00:41:31.900
And like I said, most of the time, they're not arguing anything.

00:41:31.900 --> 00:41:37.180
They're just emoting, they're expressing their love of Israel because people have told them they're supposed to love Israel.

00:41:37.880 --> 00:41:46.140
The problem is, the Israel that is chosen is the Israel of God, otherwise known as the Church.

00:41:47.280 --> 00:41:50.180
Christians are the true Israel.

00:41:50.180 --> 00:42:01.520
The nation state over in the Near East, from 1948 onward, is a geopolitical abomination, or aberration is what I've usually called it.

00:42:01.520 --> 00:42:03.400
It has nothing to do with prophecy.

00:42:03.400 --> 00:42:05.700
It has everything to do with corruption and Satan.

00:42:07.680 --> 00:42:18.160
So, the issue is that unless you can break them of the dispensationalist theology, you can't break them of the political conclusions they draw from it.

00:42:18.160 --> 00:42:21.820
Because like I said, there's no reason involved.

00:42:21.820 --> 00:42:28.320
It's just misapplication of scripture they've never even bothered to read.

00:42:28.320 --> 00:42:33.840
And I've gone over some of the passages in Revelation and elsewhere in the Bible before.

00:42:34.000 --> 00:42:38.740
So the 144,000 isn't Jews, it's representative of the entire church.

00:42:38.740 --> 00:42:45.640
It's 12 for the Old Testament, 12 for the New Testament, a number of perfection and completion related to humanity.

00:42:45.640 --> 00:42:46.660
What is 12 times 12?

00:42:46.700 --> 00:42:48.160
144.

00:42:48.160 --> 00:42:49.940
Why is it 144,000?

00:42:49.940 --> 00:42:54.900
Because the number 1,000 is symbolic of the number of God's perfection.

00:42:54.900 --> 00:42:56.260
Because what is it?

00:42:56.260 --> 00:42:58.920
10, the number of perfection, 3, the Trinity.

00:43:00.220 --> 00:43:08.740
You know, these things make perfect sense if you actually understand scripture and are able to couch these things in the context of the rest of scripture.

00:43:08.740 --> 00:43:14.460
And just so people don't think that I sound crazy talking about numbers, which is always the danger with numbers, right?

00:43:14.460 --> 00:43:17.000
What does scripture say about the number 1,000?

00:43:17.000 --> 00:43:18.700
If I were hungry, I would not tell you.

00:43:18.700 --> 00:43:20.340
If I were thirsty, I would not tell you.

00:43:20.340 --> 00:43:23.420
I own the cattle on a thousand hills.

00:43:24.540 --> 00:43:27.000
Does God own the cattle on a thousand hills?

00:43:27.000 --> 00:43:27.420
Yes and no.

00:43:28.380 --> 00:43:30.960
Because he owns the cattle on every hill, because everything is his.

00:43:30.960 --> 00:43:32.580
It's a number of God's perfection.

00:43:32.580 --> 00:43:34.420
It's not a literal number.

00:43:34.420 --> 00:43:41.660
So when you see that number somewhere in scripture, particularly in a prophetic book, your first thought should not be, oh, a literal thousand.

00:43:41.660 --> 00:43:44.920
It should be, what does this represent?

00:43:44.920 --> 00:44:04.520
And the danger of the prophetic books is that you get people who just go completely off the rails, because they don't read it in the right context, and then they try to extrapolate it out to what's currently happening in the world, and that's how you get people standing on a mountaintop, having sold all their possessions, and waiting for God to show up.

00:44:04.520 --> 00:44:05.300
What does scripture say?

00:44:05.300 --> 00:44:07.420
No man knows the hour.

00:44:07.420 --> 00:44:20.380
So, anytime you get people who are really into eschatology, you should be worried, because no one gets really, really into eschatology without going off the rails.

00:44:20.380 --> 00:44:23.500
Because eschatology is not the most important thing in scripture.

00:44:23.500 --> 00:44:24.440
Why would you focus on it?

00:44:25.040 --> 00:44:28.260
Focus on the things in scripture that are the most important.

00:44:28.260 --> 00:44:48.020
And one of the signs that you'll find, with regard to those who get into the weeds and off into crazy places with eschatology, they'll take revelation, as they say, literally, and then they will try to spiritualize away the historical books.

00:44:48.020 --> 00:44:51.820
So, that's the exact opposite of what you should do.

00:44:51.820 --> 00:44:52.980
Genesis is history.

00:44:53.620 --> 00:44:56.060
You should read it like a history book.

00:44:56.060 --> 00:44:58.140
Revelation is prophecy.

00:44:58.140 --> 00:45:00.820
You should read it in a totally different way.

00:45:00.820 --> 00:45:06.900
And part of what confuses people is that they look at scripture as if it's one book.

00:45:06.900 --> 00:45:17.700
It's one book in the sense that God is the ultimate author in terms of inspiration, and God is the one who put his seal on it, and it is bound together.

00:45:20.680 --> 00:45:33.280
But, it's not one book, because it is a collection of books, and they are of different genres, written at different times, and you need to read them in context and accordingly.

00:45:33.280 --> 00:45:43.520
And the example I usually give people, would you read poetry in exactly the same way you would read just a dry historical account of the Civil War?

00:45:44.780 --> 00:45:48.420
The answer is no, because it would be crazy to do that.

00:45:48.420 --> 00:45:59.400
But you get people who try to do that with scripture, and it's inappropriate, and they wind up in very bad places, causing us a great deal of political harm.

00:45:59.400 --> 00:46:04.060
But, like I said, for the older generation, you're probably never going to get through them.

00:46:04.060 --> 00:46:05.300
Just don't bother.

00:46:05.300 --> 00:46:10.200
Reach the younger generation that will be around longer, and may actually listen.

00:46:10.200 --> 00:46:12.700
So, just avoid the issue with your Boomer parents.

00:46:18.773 --> 00:46:28.473
The next question, question 10, what is the Lutheran answer to the reformed objection to carnal presence?

00:46:28.473 --> 00:46:30.393
And then he attaches a screenshot.

00:46:30.393 --> 00:46:34.693
For those who want to, you can go look at the screenshot on X.

00:46:34.693 --> 00:46:39.073
It's in the thread from yesterday announcing the Q&A.

00:46:40.113 --> 00:46:51.773
Basically, the question, I don't wanna get too deeply into this because this gets very complicated and at a level of theology that isn't going to be useful to most men.

00:46:51.773 --> 00:46:56.753
And that's just not necessarily the focus of this particular show.

00:46:56.753 --> 00:46:58.473
It's not my goal here.

00:47:01.493 --> 00:47:07.193
But what he's asking about is the communicatio idiomatum, right?

00:47:07.193 --> 00:47:08.773
The communication of attributes.

00:47:09.833 --> 00:47:19.313
And the communicatio is basically a description theologically of how the...

00:47:19.313 --> 00:47:20.333
I want to stop using Latin.

00:47:20.333 --> 00:47:25.533
The personal union works with regard to Christ, right?

00:47:25.533 --> 00:47:28.493
He's fully man, and he's fully God.

00:47:28.493 --> 00:47:29.973
But how does that work?

00:47:29.973 --> 00:48:03.733
And discussing this is basically seeing how far we can take our human understanding with regard to these things without going off the rails, which is always the danger when you're talking about things that are above you and beyond you, which that's sort of my starting place often when I talk to the reform, because the reform will say, you know, with regard to this issue in particular, the finite is not capable of the infinite.

00:48:04.333 --> 00:48:08.413
If they're feeling, you know, spicy, they'll say it in Latin, which is fine.

00:48:08.413 --> 00:48:09.933
Words are almost identical.

00:48:11.413 --> 00:48:27.353
But the problem with that is that so much of reformed theology is, in fact, the finite, the person telling other finites what the infinite cannot do.

00:48:28.453 --> 00:48:29.793
There's a bit of irony there.

00:48:29.793 --> 00:48:30.713
There's a contradiction.

00:48:31.613 --> 00:48:38.093
And so, things that are self-invalidating can typically be ignored.

00:48:38.093 --> 00:48:45.973
But with regard to the person of Christ, I want to give some reading recommendations for those who are actually interested in the issue.

00:48:45.973 --> 00:48:51.053
I'm not going to necessarily say that I'm going to go deeply into it for the reasons I already mentioned.

00:48:51.053 --> 00:49:02.413
But I do want to read a little bit of the formula of Concord, because that is sort of the most theologically dense document in the Book of Concord.

00:49:02.413 --> 00:49:07.273
And it goes into it in a way that's not incomprehensible for most men.

00:49:07.273 --> 00:49:11.853
It's still in a way that can be grasped and understood.

00:49:11.853 --> 00:49:15.233
But I will give some other recommendations that maybe are not in that vein.

00:49:15.233 --> 00:49:17.713
They're a little higher level.

00:49:17.713 --> 00:49:22.593
So, with regard to the person of Christ, that's what this article is.

00:49:22.613 --> 00:49:26.393
This is Article 8 of the Solid Declaration of the Formula of Concord.

00:49:26.393 --> 00:49:33.833
We believe, teach, and confess that God's Son from eternity has been a particular, distinct, entire divine person.

00:49:33.833 --> 00:49:38.053
Yet, He is true, essential, perfect God with the Father and the Holy Spirit.

00:49:38.053 --> 00:49:44.153
In the fullness of time, He received also the human nature into the unity of His person.

00:49:44.153 --> 00:49:48.133
He did not do this in such a way that there are now two persons or two Christs.

00:49:48.613 --> 00:49:52.633
And, of course, you can think of the creeds here as well, right?

00:49:52.633 --> 00:50:03.093
Christ Jesus is now in one person at the same time, true, eternal God, born of the Father from eternity, and a true man, born of the most blessed Virgin Mary.

00:50:03.093 --> 00:50:11.273
This is written in Romans 9.5, from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ who is God overall blessed forever.

00:50:11.273 --> 00:50:19.213
So, we believe, teach, and confess, of course, speaking as Lutherans, but I firmly believe this is just what scripture says.

00:50:20.233 --> 00:50:34.073
That now, in this one undivided person of Christ, there are two distinct natures, the divine, which is from eternity, and the human, which in time was received into the unity of the person of God's Son.

00:50:34.073 --> 00:50:42.313
These two natures in the person of Christ are never either separated from or mingled with each other, nor are they changed into each other.

00:50:42.933 --> 00:50:48.213
Each one abides in its nature and essence in the person of Christ to all eternity.

00:50:49.293 --> 00:50:57.573
We believe, teach, and confess, also, that both natures mentioned remain unmingled and undestroyed in their nature and essence.

00:50:57.573 --> 00:51:03.713
Each keeps its natural essential properties to all eternity and does not lay them aside.

00:51:03.713 --> 00:51:08.833
Neither do the essential properties of the one nature ever become the essential properties of the other nature.

00:51:09.393 --> 00:51:14.893
For those who are familiar with theology and philosophy, you note the technical use of the terms here, right?

00:51:14.893 --> 00:51:21.293
Essential, there are things going on here beyond just the words on the surface.

00:51:21.293 --> 00:51:30.673
We believe, teach, and confess that it is the property of the divine nature to be almighty, eternal, infinite, everywhere present at the same time and all knowing.

00:51:30.673 --> 00:51:35.353
In other words, it agrees with the property of the divine nature and its natural essence.

00:51:36.173 --> 00:51:39.453
These are essential attributes of the divine nature.

00:51:39.453 --> 00:51:44.753
Never in eternity do they become essential properties of the human nature.

00:51:44.753 --> 00:51:48.513
On the other hand, these are properties of the human nature.

00:51:48.513 --> 00:51:57.513
Being a bodily creation or creature, flesh and blood, finite and located in one place, it suffers, dies, ascends, and descends.

00:51:57.513 --> 00:52:01.893
It moves from one place to another, suffers hunger, thirst, cold, heat, and the like.

00:52:02.633 --> 00:52:07.233
These properties never become properties of the divine nature.

00:52:07.233 --> 00:52:14.893
And then I'll read one more paragraph here, because I think this is sort of what's necessary for getting into answering this question.

00:52:14.893 --> 00:52:25.433
We believe, teach, and confess that now, since the incarnation, each nature in Christ does not exist by itself, so that each is or makes up a separate person.

00:52:25.433 --> 00:52:35.033
These two natures are so united that they make up one single person, in which the divine and the received human nature are and exist at the same time.

00:52:35.033 --> 00:52:45.733
So now, since the incarnation, there belongs to the entire person of Christ, personally, not only his divine nature, but also his received human nature.

00:52:45.733 --> 00:52:53.433
So without his divinity, and also without his humanity, the person of Christ or the incarnate Son of God is not complete.

00:52:53.433 --> 00:52:56.533
We mean the Son of God who has received flesh and become man.

00:52:57.293 --> 00:53:07.953
Therefore, Christ is not two distinct persons, but one single person, even though two distinct natures are found in him, unconfused in their natural essence and properties.

00:53:10.953 --> 00:53:21.713
The question here, with regard to the reformed position theologically, the one that is being asked specifically here, is about the Lord's Supper.

00:53:21.713 --> 00:53:37.053
It's about the Lutheran conception of the real presence, or, as we also call it, the sacramental union, because the reformed also call their understanding the real presence, and we disagree, so we call it the sacramental union to make sure that it is specifically what we mean when we say it.

00:53:38.373 --> 00:53:54.713
This has arisen a number of times, and in fact, a Lutheran theologian, so-called, modern one, not ancient, recently got this wrong, and has not recanted his false statements.

00:53:54.713 --> 00:53:59.773
And it's part of why I went into this number of years ago.

00:53:59.773 --> 00:54:02.573
This is also another archival episode of the show.

00:54:02.573 --> 00:54:03.873
I would say go and listen to that.

00:54:03.873 --> 00:54:05.193
I will add that to the notes as well.

00:54:05.193 --> 00:54:08.953
It is the mode of Christ's presence in the supper.

00:54:08.953 --> 00:54:13.113
And so, I will include that in the show notes.

00:54:13.113 --> 00:54:20.633
But the objection the reformed have is that they say he is not carnally present.

00:54:20.633 --> 00:54:24.133
Part of the issue here is that it's squabbling over words, right?

00:54:24.133 --> 00:54:32.993
And so, do Lutherans believe that Christ is carnally present?

00:54:32.993 --> 00:54:35.713
We don't use that term, right?

00:54:35.713 --> 00:54:37.633
We say he is sacramentally present.

00:54:37.633 --> 00:54:41.093
We say he is truly present, he is really present.

00:54:41.093 --> 00:54:45.673
And I have gone so far as to say he's physically present, because I don't think that's inappropriate.

00:54:46.353 --> 00:54:48.893
But he's not present locally.

00:54:48.893 --> 00:54:54.193
And this is where it starts to get into philosophy that's going to be not particularly useful for a lot of men.

00:54:55.213 --> 00:55:01.453
But when we talk about presence, right, there are different kinds of presence.

00:55:01.453 --> 00:55:10.133
And thankfully for modern men, I can kind of use a very easy example to get you to understand exactly what we're talking about with presence.

00:55:10.133 --> 00:55:11.913
It's a rough example, but it works for this.

00:55:12.873 --> 00:55:20.073
I am physically present, locally present, in my chair, in my study, in East Tennessee.

00:55:20.073 --> 00:55:21.033
That's where I am.

00:55:21.033 --> 00:55:21.953
I'm a human being.

00:55:21.953 --> 00:55:24.093
That's the only place where I am, right?

00:55:24.093 --> 00:55:27.853
I know the reformed are listening to me say that, like, ah, but just wait.

00:55:28.933 --> 00:55:33.633
I am also present virtually on your screen.

00:55:33.633 --> 00:55:38.933
I am virtually present with regard to my voice in your ears, right?

00:55:38.933 --> 00:55:39.893
I am present in a different way.

00:55:39.913 --> 00:55:44.573
But you are all virtually present to me in the chat.

00:55:44.573 --> 00:55:47.213
Are you locally present in the chat?

00:55:47.213 --> 00:55:48.913
The answer is no.

00:55:48.913 --> 00:55:52.793
Is Christ locally present in the supper?

00:55:52.793 --> 00:55:55.073
We would not say he is locally present.

00:55:55.073 --> 00:56:00.053
We object to the use of localiter is what it's called, because it's just Latin for locally.

00:56:00.053 --> 00:56:01.693
It's the adverb.

00:56:01.693 --> 00:56:03.553
That is the objection.

00:56:03.553 --> 00:56:05.953
But is he physically present?

00:56:05.953 --> 00:56:07.013
The answer is yes.

00:56:07.373 --> 00:56:18.553
And so, the reform will try to say that it is an essential property of the human nature to be locally present only in one place.

00:56:18.553 --> 00:56:19.873
Okay, fine.

00:56:19.873 --> 00:56:22.073
We're not saying he's locally present in the supper.

00:56:22.073 --> 00:56:30.553
So there's no objection there with regard to the sacramental union, because his present, his presence is sacramental.

00:56:30.553 --> 00:56:31.593
Is it physical?

00:56:31.593 --> 00:56:31.973
Yes.

00:56:31.973 --> 00:56:34.733
And the reason we say that is simple.

00:56:34.733 --> 00:56:35.653
What does he say?

00:56:36.833 --> 00:56:40.073
I'm so tempted to use Latin, but I will not use the Latin.

00:56:40.073 --> 00:56:44.393
He says, this is my body, right?

00:56:45.533 --> 00:56:47.613
But think about the fullness of the statement.

00:56:47.613 --> 00:56:48.973
What is he saying?

00:56:48.973 --> 00:56:51.513
What is he holding when he says it?

00:56:51.513 --> 00:56:54.633
He's saying, you know, pretend this is bread.

00:56:54.633 --> 00:56:55.633
This is my body.

00:56:55.633 --> 00:56:58.613
I'll try to hold it in front of the camera instead of this is my body, right?

00:56:58.613 --> 00:56:59.913
Pretend it's bread.

00:56:59.913 --> 00:57:01.073
So what is he saying?

00:57:01.073 --> 00:57:03.133
This bread, well, it's bread.

00:57:03.133 --> 00:57:05.013
I can see it's bread is my body.

00:57:05.293 --> 00:57:06.333
It's also his body.

00:57:06.333 --> 00:57:08.233
It's bread and body.

00:57:08.233 --> 00:57:10.973
We simply affirm what Christ says.

00:57:10.973 --> 00:57:20.553
We're not going to subject the word of God to the logic of men and then tell God what he can't do, because he can do that.

00:57:20.553 --> 00:57:31.493
The other proof that I will give for the Reformed, because I know many of them are going to be unsatisfied with that, but this one, I don't know how you can possibly avoid it.

00:57:31.493 --> 00:57:37.853
There are two things in scripture we need to pull out in order to address this particular issue.

00:57:37.853 --> 00:57:39.593
I won't necessarily pull them up, because I don't need to.

00:57:39.753 --> 00:57:42.453
You all know these ones, right?

00:57:42.453 --> 00:57:48.553
Scripture says that in Christ, the fullness of deity dwells bodily.

00:57:48.553 --> 00:58:05.193
Well, if the fullness of deity dwells bodily in Christ, and the deity is never absent from the essence of deity, and the attributes are essential to the essence, then the fullness of the attributes of the deity are also dwelling in the Christ.

00:58:05.193 --> 00:58:06.713
That's sufficient.

00:58:06.713 --> 00:58:08.513
That's sufficient with regard to logic.

00:58:08.513 --> 00:58:10.513
It's sufficient with regard to scripture.

00:58:10.513 --> 00:58:22.873
But there is also the fact that scripture speaks of Christ in two distinct ways, two distinct phases, as it were, parts of his life.

00:58:22.873 --> 00:58:35.373
You have the state of humiliation, which is from his birth or conception until his death, right, or his resurrection, depending where exactly you want to put that line at either end.

00:58:35.373 --> 00:58:37.433
And then you have the state of exaltation.

00:58:38.753 --> 00:58:45.053
And so if you just look at that without thinking about it, it seems like, okay, fine, that makes perfect sense.

00:58:45.053 --> 00:58:48.413
What does that mean about the human nature?

00:58:48.413 --> 00:59:11.373
Well, it says the human nature is the one that is exalted to the right hand of God, because God, Christ, according to his divinity, has had the fullness of the divine attributes, the glory, the power, the omnipresence, the omniscience, all these things, from eternity past, because it is his, essentially, for all time.

00:59:11.373 --> 00:59:14.053
There's no cannoticism or anything like that here.

00:59:14.053 --> 00:59:18.213
He's not emptying himself of the deity.

00:59:18.213 --> 00:59:23.953
And so the deity is not what is exalted, because with regard to his essence, he is equal to the father.

00:59:24.473 --> 00:59:27.373
With regard to his divinity, he is equal to the father.

00:59:27.373 --> 00:59:31.453
And so the exaltation can only be of the humanity.

00:59:31.453 --> 00:59:44.293
And so if the humanity is exalted to the right hand of God, that is saying exactly what Lutherans are saying about Christ being omnipresent, omniscient, and all these other things also according to his humanity.

00:59:44.293 --> 00:59:59.893
Not because they are essential attributes of the humanity, but because in the personal union of Christ, you do not have this distinction where you can say, humanity cannot do this, and so, no, because it is the person of Christ.

00:59:59.893 --> 01:00:03.773
The person of Christ is fully God and fully man.

01:00:03.773 --> 01:00:12.313
And so, yes, he is physically present in the supper, he is sacramentally present in the supper, as he says in his word.

01:00:12.313 --> 01:00:13.933
And we simply affirm what he says in his word.

01:00:13.933 --> 01:00:17.513
We're not going to try to say, no, God, you can't do that.

01:00:17.513 --> 01:00:18.533
Christ knows what he can do.

01:00:19.393 --> 01:00:21.753
And he told us what he can do, and he told us what he will do.

01:00:21.753 --> 01:00:22.873
He promised it.

01:00:22.873 --> 01:00:24.653
We simply rely on his words.

01:00:24.653 --> 01:00:32.293
And I could go into this in greater depth, of course, and go to the communication of attributes and all the different kinds and the genus and stuff like that.

01:00:32.293 --> 01:00:36.713
But that would be for if I were going to do like a class on this subject.

01:00:36.713 --> 01:00:41.033
It's not really the point of, again, this.

01:00:41.033 --> 01:00:51.333
And so I think that's a sufficient answer for you, but I did say that I would mention some resources for you, particularly to give you a deeper understanding of the Lutheran position and the fullness of it.

01:00:51.333 --> 01:00:57.053
Start with Peeper's Dogmatics, and then read the things he references.

01:00:57.053 --> 01:01:01.833
That's generally a great starting place for Lutheran theology, just on most issues.

01:01:01.833 --> 01:01:11.053
But to give you an idea, in Peeper's Dogmatics, I have the volume over here, but it's about 300 pages on the doctrine of Christ.

01:01:11.053 --> 01:01:15.773
So I can't really summarize that in five minutes, ten minutes, whatever that was.

01:01:15.773 --> 01:01:16.613
So I would say start there.

01:01:17.193 --> 01:01:24.913
Read the Doctrine of Christ section in volume two of his three-volume work, Christian Dogmatics.

01:01:24.913 --> 01:01:28.013
It's available on Logos if you want the electronic version.

01:01:28.013 --> 01:01:30.773
It's usually available relatively cheaply as a used book.

01:01:30.773 --> 01:01:40.313
If you want the physical copy, you can order it new from CPH, but they charge an arm and a leg, so maybe don't do that.

01:01:40.313 --> 01:01:46.473
And, of course, read the fullness of article eight, of which I read part of the Solid Declaration.

01:01:46.473 --> 01:01:48.133
And that's available free online.

01:01:48.133 --> 01:01:50.193
So, thebookofconcord.org.

01:01:55.963 --> 01:01:58.863
The next question, question 11.

01:01:58.863 --> 01:02:09.223
If parents who are clearly not practicing Christians and not part of our congregation ask to have their baby baptized, should our church agree?

01:02:09.223 --> 01:02:17.903
The concern is that the child will probably not be raised as Jesus teaches in Mark 16, 16, or would refusing mean inviting the millstone?

01:02:21.483 --> 01:02:27.703
The baseline answer to the question is that it is always good when a child is baptized.

01:02:28.903 --> 01:02:47.363
But the sort of caveat there is that if you know the child is not going to be raised a Christian, if you know the child is going to be taught to reject his baptism, as the wording Lutherans would use, then you actually are not doing him any favors.

01:02:47.363 --> 01:02:52.663
You are, in some ways, even sort of profaning the sacrament.

01:02:53.783 --> 01:02:57.523
But the usual Lutheran way around this, right?

01:02:57.523 --> 01:03:06.083
If you have unbelieving parents of the child, for some reason want the child to be baptized, which there's already some questions there, right?

01:03:06.083 --> 01:03:09.443
Why do unbelievers want the child baptized?

01:03:09.443 --> 01:03:12.083
That's something for the pastor to suss out, right?

01:03:12.083 --> 01:03:16.223
This is an opportunity to talk to them about the Christian faith.

01:03:16.223 --> 01:03:20.683
You recognize your child should be baptized, why aren't you attending church?

01:03:20.683 --> 01:03:21.443
Why aren't you Christian?

01:03:22.123 --> 01:03:24.323
If you recognize the realities thing, right?

01:03:24.323 --> 01:03:26.983
This is something that a good pastor should be doing.

01:03:26.983 --> 01:03:34.243
And just the baptism itself provides the opportunity to preach the gospel to the parents and for others who are in attendance.

01:03:34.243 --> 01:03:44.063
It's one of the prime opportunities that we get to talk about these things with unbelievers in a context where they're actually likely to listen.

01:03:44.063 --> 01:03:46.163
Another, of course, would be marriage, right?

01:03:46.203 --> 01:03:51.823
The marriage ceremony, you should have a short statement of the gospel there as well.

01:03:51.823 --> 01:04:00.423
So, if you have the unbelieving parents, the usual Lutheran solution is called godparents, which is what Roman Catholics and others do as well, right?

01:04:00.483 --> 01:04:09.903
You have someone present who swears that he will undertake the duty to raise this child in the Christian faith, right?

01:04:09.903 --> 01:04:19.703
Because that's part of the ceremony of baptism is the parents swearing to raise the child as a Christian, or in this case, the godparents.

01:04:19.703 --> 01:04:24.303
Usually, you want to have both present because sometimes parents die, things happen.

01:04:24.303 --> 01:04:28.383
So, you want some assurance there, some insurance against disaster.

01:04:29.883 --> 01:04:42.043
So, if you can get godparents who are believers to be present and to swear that they will raise the child in the Christian faith despite the unbelief of the parents, then by all means, baptize the child.

01:04:42.043 --> 01:04:54.083
If you have unbelieving parents and you have no godparents, so basically, you have the second worst possible scenario, right?

01:04:54.083 --> 01:05:00.463
The worst possible scenario is, you know, Satan has come to you and say, we want to baptize our child because we want to profane and insult the sacrament.

01:05:00.463 --> 01:05:01.543
You tell them no, right?

01:05:01.543 --> 01:05:03.223
That's the easy case.

01:05:03.223 --> 01:05:15.843
The hard case is the worst case where you have unbelieving parents who, for some reason, want to have their child baptized but then clearly have no intention of raising the child as a Christian.

01:05:17.723 --> 01:05:24.163
That one is going to be a matter for the pastor because he is the one who has to investigate the parents.

01:05:24.163 --> 01:05:31.483
He is the one who has to figure out what's going on in this child's life, what is the family life going to be like, what is the home life going to be like.

01:05:31.483 --> 01:05:37.903
Are these parents actual unbelievers, or are they just sort of very weak in their faith?

01:05:37.903 --> 01:05:39.243
Have they fallen away?

01:05:39.243 --> 01:05:40.903
Did they used to believe?

01:05:40.903 --> 01:05:43.683
Are they open to attending church?

01:05:43.683 --> 01:05:47.903
Are they open to their child at least being catechized?

01:05:47.903 --> 01:05:50.263
There are a lot of moving parts here.

01:05:50.263 --> 01:05:54.383
That is the duty of the pastor to figure out exactly what is going on and make that call.

01:05:55.723 --> 01:06:06.783
I think that if you can mount any argument whatsoever that you are going to be able to get this child some sort of education in the Christian faith, then by all means, baptize that child.

01:06:06.783 --> 01:06:09.003
Baptism is still a means of grace.

01:06:09.003 --> 01:06:10.303
Baptism is a sacrament.

01:06:10.303 --> 01:06:13.883
It is a blessing and a gift from God, and it should always be cherished.

01:06:13.883 --> 01:06:16.583
And baptizing a child is always a good thing.

01:06:18.643 --> 01:06:26.703
So if there is any way that you can ensure this child is going to be raised in the Christian faith, then yes, baptize that child.

01:06:26.703 --> 01:06:32.203
But the obvious extreme example, you know, the Satanists, I don't think that's probably the case here.

01:06:32.203 --> 01:06:35.723
So have the pastor call them in and talk to them.

01:06:35.723 --> 01:06:39.203
Have another elder there to answer as many questions as you can.

01:06:39.203 --> 01:06:42.443
Try to get them to understand this is an important thing.

01:06:42.443 --> 01:06:43.243
It's a real thing.

01:06:43.243 --> 01:06:44.003
It means something.

01:06:44.003 --> 01:06:50.643
You recognize that by virtue of the fact, you've admitted by virtue of the fact that you want your child baptized.

01:06:51.263 --> 01:06:54.163
Why would you want that if it means nothing?

01:06:54.163 --> 01:06:56.943
So the door is open.

01:06:56.943 --> 01:06:58.183
Bring them in.

01:06:58.443 --> 01:06:59.203
That's the point.

01:06:59.203 --> 01:07:01.223
That's the goal of the pastor.

01:07:01.223 --> 01:07:03.903
And hopefully, that's what happens in this case.

01:07:03.903 --> 01:07:08.963
Hopefully, they recognize that they want the child baptized because this is something that's important.

01:07:08.963 --> 01:07:12.363
And so they themselves become believers as well.

01:07:12.363 --> 01:07:17.503
But certainly take the opportunity of a baptism to preach to those who are unbelievers and are present.

01:07:17.583 --> 01:07:21.003
Because many times, at a baptism, you have unbelievers present.

01:07:24.823 --> 01:07:28.323
The next question, question 12.

01:07:28.323 --> 01:07:38.703
What do you think of the push pins and yarn on corkboard theory about the number 666, Saturn, Jews, stones, cubes, color black, Sabbath, etc.?

01:07:38.703 --> 01:07:42.823
I see many connections, but feel like there's a deeper evil meaning that I cannot grasp.

01:07:42.823 --> 01:07:44.363
Maybe we're not meant to.

01:07:44.363 --> 01:07:46.003
It's a little spooky.

01:07:46.003 --> 01:07:47.143
You sort of answered your own question.

01:07:47.223 --> 01:07:49.103
We're not meant to.

01:07:49.103 --> 01:07:54.983
Because there are some things that you're actually just better off not knowing, right?

01:07:54.983 --> 01:07:55.723
We know that.

01:07:55.723 --> 01:08:04.183
That's sort of the narrative of the fall, of the beginning of Genesis and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

01:08:04.183 --> 01:08:09.303
There are things that men are not meant to know.

01:08:09.303 --> 01:08:12.263
God didn't give us any access to it.

01:08:12.263 --> 01:08:14.803
God didn't give us any way to gain access to it.

01:08:14.863 --> 01:08:19.363
And that's sort of a key here, because I know those, there are many who will hear, well, all knowledge is good.

01:08:19.363 --> 01:08:21.843
First off, that's a lie.

01:08:21.843 --> 01:08:25.663
And the example I usually use, let me take a sip of my tea before I continue.

01:08:28.383 --> 01:08:32.643
The example I usually use is an extreme one, because extreme examples work really well.

01:08:35.363 --> 01:08:42.323
Hopefully, none of you listening know what it is like to be stabbed, right?

01:08:42.323 --> 01:08:48.783
But if you get stabbed, you have gained knowledge in the process of being stabbed.

01:08:48.783 --> 01:08:51.323
Is that knowledge good?

01:08:51.323 --> 01:08:55.483
I don't think there's any way to say that knowledge is good.

01:08:55.483 --> 01:09:01.283
Would, and you can even take the abstracted out to the extreme, and then analyze that.

01:09:01.283 --> 01:09:09.763
Would the universe be better if knowledge of what it is like to be stabbed never occurred, never came into being?

01:09:09.763 --> 01:09:11.243
The answer is yes.

01:09:11.243 --> 01:09:13.003
So, there's bad knowledge.

01:09:14.223 --> 01:09:15.323
It's not morally neutral.

01:09:15.323 --> 01:09:17.223
Not all knowledge is morally neutral.

01:09:17.223 --> 01:09:31.723
Some things are horrible, and I would say, notably, I have never had to have this discussion with friends who practice criminal law and deal with, so, for instance, sex crimes.

01:09:31.723 --> 01:09:41.583
You're never going to find a single attorney working in the DA's office who deals in that unit and says that there's no such thing as bad knowledge because he knows what it is, because he's seen it and he has it in his head.

01:09:41.583 --> 01:09:44.463
And it will never go away until the day dies.

01:09:44.463 --> 01:09:47.823
So, there's such a thing as bad knowledge.

01:09:47.823 --> 01:09:53.163
Knowledge of demons and things like that in this way is going to be bad knowledge.

01:09:53.163 --> 01:09:59.443
Does that mean that knowledge of sort of the symbols and the conspiracies and things like that and how they work is always bad?

01:09:59.443 --> 01:10:09.243
I don't think so because at least for certain men, it's going to give you the ability to recognize it and to map these things out and be able to warn other men.

01:10:09.243 --> 01:10:17.663
Not all men should go after these things because some men don't have the same defenses, either intellectually, psychologically, spiritually.

01:10:17.663 --> 01:10:26.643
If a man who does not have sufficient defenses against these things starts investigating them, he's opening himself up to demons.

01:10:26.643 --> 01:10:29.443
And possession is real.

01:10:29.443 --> 01:10:31.883
You don't want to play with that stuff.

01:10:35.123 --> 01:10:42.623
So the other part of that, the point I wanted to make with regard to the access to knowledge, right?

01:10:42.623 --> 01:10:45.583
There are things to which God has given us access.

01:10:45.583 --> 01:10:48.383
The workings of the universe, to some degree.

01:10:48.383 --> 01:10:54.603
It gets a little wonky when you get out into the quantum, because things start to behave differently when you look at them.

01:10:54.603 --> 01:10:56.403
But beyond that, right?

01:10:56.403 --> 01:10:57.863
Higher level.

01:10:57.863 --> 01:10:58.943
God has given us knowledge.

01:10:58.943 --> 01:11:01.123
He has given us access to knowledge, right?

01:11:01.123 --> 01:11:03.143
You know, I'll hold this up again.

01:11:03.143 --> 01:11:05.723
It took knowledge to figure out how to make ink.

01:11:05.723 --> 01:11:08.483
It took knowledge to figure out how to make teal ink.

01:11:08.483 --> 01:11:13.043
It took knowledge how to figure out, you know, blotter paper, and this design, and glass, and all those things.

01:11:13.043 --> 01:11:14.043
That took knowledge.

01:11:14.043 --> 01:11:20.663
We have access to that knowledge because God has provided us the tools and has not made the knowledge inaccessible.

01:11:21.783 --> 01:11:30.403
We have no tools to access knowledge of how that demonic stuff works.

01:11:30.403 --> 01:11:39.683
Now, the surface level, recognizing their symbols, and when they're bragging and confessing their crimes, and things like that, and mapping their networks, that's all basically just...

01:11:40.563 --> 01:11:44.563
psychology, and politics, and sociology, we have that, we have access to that.

01:11:44.563 --> 01:11:57.783
But the rules God has imposed on demons, for how they interact with the world and human beings, how demons interact with each other, the hierarchy, how none of that is accessible to men.

01:11:57.783 --> 01:12:00.843
There are only two places you could possibly get that.

01:12:00.843 --> 01:12:04.083
You could get it from God, or you could get it from demons.

01:12:05.303 --> 01:12:11.223
God doesn't seem like he's going to tell us anything about it, and so your only possible route would be demons.

01:12:12.403 --> 01:12:23.283
As a general rule, and I hope this goes without saying, you should one, not be asking demons questions, and two, you shouldn't believe their answers, even if they tell you.

01:12:23.283 --> 01:12:27.103
So there's no good way to gain access to the information.

01:12:27.103 --> 01:12:30.843
There are only horribly dangerous and wicked ways to do it.

01:12:30.843 --> 01:12:34.003
So yes, we should just, we should ignore it.

01:12:34.003 --> 01:12:36.463
We should not deal with that stuff.

01:12:36.583 --> 01:12:37.763
We should not try to delve into it.

01:12:37.763 --> 01:12:40.783
It's one of those things that Satan tries to use to lead you astray, right?

01:12:41.043 --> 01:12:52.603
It's bait for a certain kind of man, because it's esoteric, it's interesting knowledge, it's something that other men don't possess, and maybe there's a reason.

01:12:52.603 --> 01:12:54.103
Maybe you don't want to possess it.

01:12:54.103 --> 01:12:56.503
Maybe you don't want to be possessed by it.

01:12:56.503 --> 01:13:01.023
So is there some sort of connection there?

01:13:01.023 --> 01:13:02.883
Are there threads running through these things?

01:13:02.943 --> 01:13:04.383
Absolutely yes.

01:13:04.383 --> 01:13:19.123
But I think the best thing that we can try to do is endeavor to erase their reality in this world, their presence in their power, and then not ever contact or deal with them again as best we can.

01:13:19.123 --> 01:13:28.523
I don't think trying to map the rules of engagement of hell is a wise way for a Christian to spend his time.

01:13:28.523 --> 01:13:31.463
So yes, there's reality to it.

01:13:32.263 --> 01:13:36.603
But it's not knowledge you want, and it's not knowledge you should seek.

01:13:37.883 --> 01:13:39.923
I'm going to refill my tea.

01:13:42.603 --> 01:13:47.343
As a slight contrast to talking about the demonic, I'll have some tea.

01:13:50.443 --> 01:13:55.803
Question 13, and then I think I'll just run over a little bit, and I'll get to some questions in the chat.

01:13:57.043 --> 01:14:06.203
Christ commanded, As for these enemies of mine, who would not have me to rule over them, bring them here and slaughter them at my feet.

01:14:06.203 --> 01:14:11.503
How am I not supposed to imitatize the Eschaton with what seems so clear a command?

01:14:11.503 --> 01:14:14.763
His intended audience was 2,000 plus years in the future?

01:14:14.763 --> 01:14:16.103
Question mark.

01:14:17.583 --> 01:14:24.763
This ties back in to the Magdeburg Confession and the question about violence and things like that.

01:14:24.763 --> 01:14:34.983
What is it that Christians are supposed to do in this world with regard to bringing the nations under Christ's control, right?

01:14:34.983 --> 01:14:37.143
That's the essential question here.

01:14:37.143 --> 01:14:43.183
And what tools are permitted for us to use in seeking to achieve that end?

01:14:44.843 --> 01:14:50.383
Violence is not impermissible, but the sword is entrusted to the state.

01:14:51.183 --> 01:15:01.143
So, for instance, when Europeans went and conquered the third world and Christianized much of it in the process, that was not impermissible.

01:15:01.143 --> 01:15:03.943
Enslaving was not impermissible.

01:15:03.983 --> 01:15:08.903
Using these means in order to spread the faith was not impermissible.

01:15:08.903 --> 01:15:17.183
And so, should we as Christians, speaking in terms of a Christian state, destroy those who are enemies of Christ?

01:15:17.183 --> 01:15:18.483
I think the answer is yes.

01:15:19.963 --> 01:15:26.743
I don't mean that our foreign policy should be to wage war with everyone at all times with everything we possibly have.

01:15:26.743 --> 01:15:29.043
It's still a matter of wisdom, right?

01:15:29.043 --> 01:15:37.803
You're not going to declare war on the entire non-Christian world day one of theoretical Christian nationalist administration.

01:15:37.803 --> 01:15:44.903
That would be stupid, unless, you know, God specifically tells you to do it, which I don't think that he does that typically.

01:15:46.623 --> 01:15:50.903
So, are we permitted to engage in a holy war?

01:15:50.903 --> 01:15:55.183
I say the answer is yes, but it again is a matter of wisdom.

01:15:55.183 --> 01:16:01.163
It is something that should be undertaken with due deliberation and in accordance with God's commands and word.

01:16:02.843 --> 01:16:06.263
So, it's partly related to...

01:16:06.303 --> 01:16:18.763
You have so many Christians these days who were almost tying back into how you interpret different books of scripture in different genres, but you have so many who want to spiritualize away the passages about the conquest of Canaan.

01:16:18.763 --> 01:16:20.563
And you can't do that because it's history.

01:16:20.563 --> 01:16:21.523
It's a history book.

01:16:21.523 --> 01:16:23.843
It's not symbolic.

01:16:23.843 --> 01:16:27.243
I mean, it is symbolic on one layer, but it's not primarily symbolic.

01:16:27.243 --> 01:16:32.303
The surface first layer is the reality of the thing having happened in history.

01:16:32.303 --> 01:16:34.343
These events transpired as recorded.

01:16:36.503 --> 01:16:38.943
You can't spiritualize them away.

01:16:38.943 --> 01:16:52.163
And so you have to accept the fact that God occasionally commands genocide, and he commands it as a punishment for wickedness, and he commands that the righteous enact it on his behalf.

01:16:52.163 --> 01:16:54.883
And God doesn't change.

01:16:54.883 --> 01:16:59.723
So I don't think that the people who try to argue it away by saying, well, that was then, right?

01:16:59.783 --> 01:17:01.383
Oh, that was then, okay.

01:17:01.383 --> 01:17:08.743
You're making the exact same argument as the people who say that homosexuality is fine now because Sodom and Gomorrah was, oh, that was then.

01:17:08.743 --> 01:17:11.803
No, God doesn't change.

01:17:11.803 --> 01:17:22.583
And nations that worship demons are still an abomination to God, and if he gives them into your hands, if he delivers them into your hands, it is your duty to destroy them.

01:17:22.583 --> 01:17:28.443
Because God has given them to you, and God has given them to you partly as a test.

01:17:29.143 --> 01:17:39.043
And it's one of the ways that, quite frankly, Europeans failed historically, because we kept a lot of rank demon worshipers around and let them go right back to worshiping their demons.

01:17:39.043 --> 01:17:41.583
I think it's one of the reasons that we're currently being judged.

01:17:43.643 --> 01:17:51.263
So, no, there is a political and a geopolitical element to Christianity, and it is something that has been ignored for far too long.

01:17:53.463 --> 01:18:00.503
But that is the thirteenth question that I have for tonight.

01:18:00.503 --> 01:18:08.383
So, I will go through the chat now, and see which questions I can answer.

01:18:08.383 --> 01:18:11.163
I see the question about Ezra 9 and 10.

01:18:12.223 --> 01:18:13.723
I can answer briefly.

01:18:13.723 --> 01:18:16.463
I'll just read the question first, question 14.

01:18:17.963 --> 01:18:20.503
Make notes for myself so I can make the show notes later.

01:18:24.623 --> 01:18:28.743
It seems that Ezra 9 and 10 are not often cited in the interracial marriage debate.

01:18:28.743 --> 01:18:31.443
I have never heard you mention them in your explanation of the issue.

01:18:31.443 --> 01:18:33.423
Why is that?

01:18:33.423 --> 01:18:47.063
Partly, it's because Ezra 9 and 10 are very difficult to apply, not in the sense of being difficult to exegete, but difficult to employ in a way that doesn't just explode the conversation immediately.

01:18:48.223 --> 01:18:59.783
And so, I don't typically use them in part because of that, and partly because I haven't personally decided how best yet to integrate them into the overall tapestry of the argument.

01:18:59.783 --> 01:19:01.523
I just haven't set aside the time to do it.

01:19:01.523 --> 01:19:03.163
I probably should.

01:19:03.163 --> 01:19:13.803
I should probably address the issue at greater length at some point in an actual article, an essay, because it is just going to be a continual issue.

01:19:13.803 --> 01:19:14.843
It's just going to keep coming up.

01:19:14.943 --> 01:19:18.543
It's never going to go away, at least for the foreseeable future.

01:19:19.723 --> 01:19:22.383
But I'm not avoiding it, because, you know, I don't believe it or anything.

01:19:22.383 --> 01:19:27.923
No, I haven't brought it up, because it causes some problems.

01:19:27.923 --> 01:19:39.683
And it is, to some degree, a little bit difficult to apply, because obviously, it's not a blanket rule to send away your foreign wives, right?

01:19:39.683 --> 01:19:41.583
It can't be, because God hates divorce.

01:19:42.723 --> 01:19:52.343
But at the same time, now you have God hating divorce, and at least one case in which divorce is not only permissible, but the moral option.

01:19:54.523 --> 01:19:56.023
That's a challenge.

01:19:56.023 --> 01:20:08.063
That is something that has to be applied and interpreted very carefully, because particularly for the teacher who teaches on it, he better get it right, because, you know, the stricter judgment awaits, and you don't want to get something like that wrong.

01:20:08.063 --> 01:20:08.903
It's an important issue.

01:20:09.903 --> 01:20:19.063
So, I'm not necessarily avoiding it, I just haven't used it, because I haven't decided exactly how to integrate it with the overall argument.

01:20:19.063 --> 01:20:20.023
But yes, it's relevant.

01:20:20.023 --> 01:20:21.023
It's absolutely relevant.

01:20:30.210 --> 01:20:36.910
Your thoughts on Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne, Indiana, versus Concordia Seminary in St.

01:20:36.910 --> 01:20:38.250
Louis.

01:20:38.250 --> 01:20:46.390
Fort Wayne is typically the more conservative at this point, so if you are going to attend one, go to Fort Wayne.

01:20:46.390 --> 01:21:12.410
But similar to what I've said about seminaries previously, at this point, yes, there's some value in a seminary education, I'm not going to say there isn't, but if you can obtain the necessary education some other way, and then become ordained in the relevant body, at least consider that.

01:21:12.410 --> 01:21:16.910
Unless, of course, you have a full ride scholarship or whatever, then by all means, take advantage of that, that's fine.

01:21:16.910 --> 01:21:39.030
But I don't know that I could justify spending that much money and time for what is now, these days, at basically every existing seminary, a rather lackluster education, and also having to deal with some professors who are not going to be, we'll say, firm Christians.

01:21:39.030 --> 01:21:46.150
So, there are serious problems there, but there's still value to be had.

01:21:46.150 --> 01:21:47.530
It's a wisdom call, right?

01:21:47.530 --> 01:21:48.750
It's a calculation.

01:21:50.910 --> 01:21:58.810
Do you think Latin is a compromised language for someone to learn, or is it important to learn because of Hebrew?

01:22:00.130 --> 01:22:07.950
Well, Hebrew is just not anything that a Christian needs to learn ever, and we'd all be better if it were erased from the earth.

01:22:07.950 --> 01:22:17.750
But Latin is fine, but Latin is not a language you need to learn for scripture, right?

01:22:17.750 --> 01:22:21.950
The Vulgate is not the inspired word of God.

01:22:21.950 --> 01:22:31.110
I'm not saying the Vulgate is a bad translation, it has its quirks, but it's not a divinely inspired text like the Septuagint.

01:22:31.110 --> 01:22:35.150
So you don't need to learn Latin so you can read the Vulgate.

01:22:35.150 --> 01:22:37.790
Latin is useful for other reasons.

01:22:37.790 --> 01:22:42.010
Latin will force you to learn grammar, particularly as an English speaker.

01:22:42.010 --> 01:22:54.390
It's going to force you to learn grammar you never learned as an English speaker, because grammar is just not taught in most English-speaking countries anymore, unfortunately, or it's taught in a very surface level.

01:22:55.470 --> 01:23:04.250
Excuse me, Latin is going to force you to understand the machine of language in a way that you probably don't if you speak only English.

01:23:04.250 --> 01:23:12.730
If you learn some other language that has more structured grammar, German, Latin, Greek, you'll get it as well.

01:23:12.730 --> 01:23:23.950
But Latin has utility, and it opens up a world of poetry and historical writings and things, and it has use, but it's not something you need to learn for the sake of scripture.

01:23:23.950 --> 01:23:25.910
Greek is far more important.

01:23:25.910 --> 01:23:35.330
And quite frankly, I know that a certain subset of Christians aren't going to like to hear it, but German is better than Latin for theology.

01:23:35.330 --> 01:23:43.910
Because a giant chunk of theology was written in German, not Latin.

01:23:43.910 --> 01:23:46.510
And that's particularly so for Protestants, right?

01:23:47.510 --> 01:23:49.970
So, but no, there's nothing wrong with learning Latin.

01:23:49.970 --> 01:23:51.490
I know some Latin.

01:23:51.490 --> 01:23:52.970
I'm nowhere near fluent, certainly.

01:23:52.970 --> 01:23:56.130
I couldn't have a conversation with the pope if he were so inclined.

01:24:01.627 --> 01:24:07.187
Any advice for a university student in a campus full of liberals?

01:24:10.427 --> 01:24:12.887
Keep some of your opinions to yourself.

01:24:15.227 --> 01:24:21.287
And the reason that I say that is that you should think, why am I here?

01:24:21.287 --> 01:24:23.007
What am I here to do?

01:24:23.007 --> 01:24:35.407
And yes, historically, of course, part of the reason to be on a university campus was to debate issues, to have interesting discussions, to have that meeting of minds and mixing of ideas and things like that, right?

01:24:35.407 --> 01:24:39.247
But you're not going to find that these days.

01:24:39.247 --> 01:24:44.667
What you're going to find is hostility and attack and altercation, and possibly assault.

01:24:44.667 --> 01:24:58.447
So I don't think there's any real utility for you in broadcasting your ideas and making yourself a target, unless, of course, that's, you know, your life path is that's what you're planning on doing.

01:24:58.447 --> 01:24:59.487
Then, you know, start early.

01:24:59.627 --> 01:25:08.247
But if you are just attending to get your degree, which is most likely what you're doing, then attend to get your degree.

01:25:08.247 --> 01:25:13.687
You know, don't cause unnecessary problems for yourself.

01:25:13.687 --> 01:25:15.667
There's just no need to do it.

01:25:15.667 --> 01:25:17.487
Let them be stupid.

01:25:17.487 --> 01:25:19.747
You know, they want to be stupid in their little bubble.

01:25:19.747 --> 01:25:23.287
Let them be stupid in their little bubble until life slaps them.

01:25:23.287 --> 01:25:26.947
You can discuss the issues with those who are like minded and close friends, right?

01:25:27.007 --> 01:25:30.027
That's, we're getting back into a wisdom call again.

01:25:30.027 --> 01:25:33.727
You know the men with whom you can discuss issues and the men with whom you cannot.

01:25:33.727 --> 01:25:36.167
So it's the same sort of thing.

01:25:36.167 --> 01:25:39.507
I've answered the question before with regard to family and things like that.

01:25:39.507 --> 01:25:49.367
There are just some issues you have to think, okay, fine, we're not going to deal with this because dealing with it is just going to cause strife and trouble and suffering, and it's not worth the cost.

01:25:49.367 --> 01:25:55.587
So on a university campus, you're really trying to graduate.

01:25:55.667 --> 01:25:58.447
You're trying to get your degree.

01:25:58.447 --> 01:26:00.307
Should a university be more than that?

01:26:00.327 --> 01:26:00.907
Yes.

01:26:00.907 --> 01:26:02.467
Is it these days?

01:26:02.467 --> 01:26:03.607
No.

01:26:03.607 --> 01:26:08.127
And that was true to a large degree, even when I was in undergrad.

01:26:08.127 --> 01:26:10.787
I mean, it's not that long ago, but it's been a while.

01:26:10.787 --> 01:26:14.447
I'm 40, so even when I was in undergrad.

01:26:14.447 --> 01:26:25.207
Granted, I was on a relatively left-wing campus at the University of Michigan, but even then, you probably don't want to reveal too many of your far-right positions, right?

01:26:25.207 --> 01:26:27.127
Far-right.

01:26:27.127 --> 01:26:34.467
Because the only right-wing stance that is relatively acceptable on university campuses is being a Libertarian.

01:26:34.467 --> 01:26:39.347
Because they look at Libertarians as just being degenerate drug users, and they're like, Oh, it's my favorite brother, right?

01:26:39.347 --> 01:26:40.267
That's how they look at them.

01:26:40.267 --> 01:26:46.487
So, you know, the guy who has weird views on taxes, that's how they think of Libertarians.

01:26:46.487 --> 01:26:49.627
So yeah, just don't reveal your power level, basically.

01:26:49.627 --> 01:26:51.187
There's no need to, there's no reason to.

01:26:51.187 --> 01:26:53.467
It doesn't benefit you, it won't benefit them.

01:27:04.946 --> 01:27:07.066
See if there are any other questions in the chat.

01:27:13.482 --> 01:27:19.962
Someone asked about the legal or constitutional implications of the 1790 Naturalization Act for America Today.

01:27:19.962 --> 01:27:27.502
That is a slightly more complicated and complex question that I'm going to answer off the top of my head.

01:27:27.502 --> 01:27:33.722
So I will note that one for a later episode.

01:27:37.742 --> 01:27:41.182
Constitutional law was not my specialty.

01:27:41.182 --> 01:27:43.902
I did actually focus on a little bit, but it was never my specialty.

01:27:43.902 --> 01:27:47.922
The question of the Constitution generally is that it won't be relevant going forward.

01:27:47.922 --> 01:27:51.982
It will be relevant for a period of time, but it's not going to get us where we need to go.

01:27:51.982 --> 01:27:54.802
And at most, it's going to stand in the way.

01:27:54.802 --> 01:27:59.162
Sort of the basic answer to the constitutional question, but not specifically that one.

01:28:12.838 --> 01:28:14.078
Let's see.

01:28:17.198 --> 01:28:30.218
I spoke with someone about World War II, and I brought up that God commanded destruction of the Amalekites, and they basically said, yeah, but God explicitly told them to, and not Uncle Adolf.

01:28:30.218 --> 01:28:31.358
What would you say to this?

01:28:31.358 --> 01:28:38.318
Well, neither side in that conflict descended from Amalek, so it just isn't relevant.

01:28:39.398 --> 01:28:43.838
And also, the Jews are an apostate nation.

01:28:43.838 --> 01:28:51.298
They don't have any command from God to do or to execute or implement anything.

01:28:51.298 --> 01:28:59.398
They're hostile to him, they hate him, and he hates them, because God does not just hate the sin, he hates the sinner as well, because you can't just hate the sin.

01:28:59.398 --> 01:29:03.598
That's completely incoherent, because there's no sin without the sinner.

01:29:03.598 --> 01:29:09.198
So, obviously, his command to them is to repent, to turn from their wickedness, which they will not do.

01:29:09.198 --> 01:29:23.138
But people who bring up Amalek on our side are just trying to invert what the Jews claim, because the Jews claim that everyone else, basically, on earth, is Amalek, largely those of fair complexion.

01:29:23.138 --> 01:29:29.598
So, they hate Germans, specifically, they hate the Iranians, they hate most of Europe.

01:29:29.598 --> 01:29:31.858
They try to say that we are Amalek.

01:29:31.858 --> 01:29:32.958
We're descended from Japheth.

01:29:33.758 --> 01:29:36.198
It's not even the right son of Noah.

01:29:36.198 --> 01:29:45.338
Amalek is their cousin, not ours, but they make these crazy claims, and when men on the right try to invert it, it just sounds ridiculous.

01:29:45.338 --> 01:29:47.478
There's no reason to do it.

01:29:47.478 --> 01:29:48.918
We aren't Amalek.

01:29:48.918 --> 01:29:51.018
They aren't Amalek.

01:29:51.018 --> 01:29:53.698
They are evil, Christ-killing apostates.

01:29:53.698 --> 01:29:55.078
I feel like that's probably sufficient.

01:30:11.600 --> 01:30:17.100
What do you think about Japheth being mythologized into Jupiter by later Indo-Europeans?

01:30:18.680 --> 01:30:21.560
I do think that's probably part of it.

01:30:21.560 --> 01:30:24.380
I think that's part of how that played out.

01:30:25.400 --> 01:30:30.300
There are obviously some, I don't want to get too deeply into mythology, but there are some distinctions.

01:30:30.300 --> 01:30:32.260
So you have Odin, right?

01:30:32.260 --> 01:30:34.100
There are some obvious parallels with Noah.

01:30:34.820 --> 01:30:36.360
What does Odin carry around?

01:30:36.360 --> 01:30:37.820
Ravens.

01:30:37.820 --> 01:30:39.160
What did Noah send out from the Ark?

01:30:39.740 --> 01:30:41.540
Ravens, also dove, of course.

01:30:41.540 --> 01:30:47.400
But you get those parallels, you get the wandering about in the forest.

01:30:47.400 --> 01:30:54.400
Maybe it's a throwback to the fact the first worship of God took place in a grove, because you had sacred trees, right?

01:30:54.400 --> 01:31:04.580
One of the ways you can interpret the tree in Genesis is not being a singular tree, but tree in the sense that we would say apple tree, right?

01:31:04.580 --> 01:31:07.160
As a species, and so a grove.

01:31:07.480 --> 01:31:10.380
So, the first worship of God took place in a forest.

01:31:10.380 --> 01:31:15.480
Even if it was one tree, it's still in the Garden of Eden, which is full of fruit trees, so it's still a forest.

01:31:15.480 --> 01:31:23.200
But you have a lot of parallels there, and you have obviously the similarity of the name Japheth and Jupiter, Jove, things like that.

01:31:23.200 --> 01:31:25.180
You have the titles for them.

01:31:25.180 --> 01:31:28.440
You have, you know, the Allfather and things like that.

01:31:28.440 --> 01:31:32.060
It's a title for the head of something.

01:31:32.060 --> 01:31:35.560
Well, it's the federal head of the European race, Japheth.

01:31:36.720 --> 01:31:44.000
In some cases, a conflation of Japheth and Noah and maybe some other ancestor who did great things as well.

01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:52.020
But that sort of conflation happens with mythology when you have oral retellings of these stories down through the centuries.

01:31:52.020 --> 01:31:54.560
Basically a giant game of telephone, right?

01:31:54.560 --> 01:31:57.880
I think that a lot of that played into European mythology.

01:31:57.880 --> 01:32:00.900
I think a lot of it is based in reality.

01:32:00.900 --> 01:32:04.280
Is there some influence from malign forces as well?

01:32:04.480 --> 01:32:05.600
Absolutely.

01:32:05.600 --> 01:32:09.960
You certainly have some very strange things in some of the European mythologies.

01:32:10.740 --> 01:32:14.160
The Greek gods are not the best people in the world.

01:32:14.160 --> 01:32:18.200
But that could mean they were just mythologized people, because people are often like that.

01:32:18.200 --> 01:32:20.720
So is there reality to mythology?

01:32:20.720 --> 01:32:22.400
Absolutely.

01:32:22.400 --> 01:32:29.720
And is the European mythology aligned with and parallel to the biblical truth in some ways?

01:32:29.720 --> 01:32:31.160
Absolutely as well.

01:32:31.160 --> 01:32:39.260
I've said before, I think that's one of the reasons that Europeans were able to be converted back to Christianity so easily.

01:32:39.260 --> 01:32:49.300
And it was much more difficult in other cases, because you don't have those parallels in, say, African mythology, ignoring intelligence issues and other things like that.

01:32:49.300 --> 01:32:50.420
You don't have the parallels.

01:32:50.420 --> 01:32:54.820
You don't have these figures who look very much like Christ.

01:32:54.820 --> 01:32:57.560
You don't have these figures who look very much like Noah.

01:32:57.560 --> 01:33:09.200
And all of these things, you can draw out and bring someone into the Christian faith by saying, your ancestors weren't entirely wrong, they just played telephone a little bit and messed some stuff up.

01:33:09.200 --> 01:33:11.020
Let me tell you the truth.

01:33:11.020 --> 01:33:18.300
As opposed to coming to someone and saying, literally everything your ancestors believed in did was wrong and evil, and you have to stop.

01:33:18.300 --> 01:33:24.320
That's what we found when we got to Africa, and they were eating people and engaging in witchcraft and all these other things.

01:33:24.320 --> 01:33:25.940
That's a harder sell, right?

01:33:27.040 --> 01:33:32.420
So, I think that played into the Christianization, the conversion of Europe to Christianity.

01:33:32.420 --> 01:33:44.020
I think that our ancestors did not fall as far and did not fall for as long with regard to their apostasy, and so they just weren't as evil.

01:33:44.020 --> 01:33:45.960
That is an easier conversion.

01:33:45.960 --> 01:33:53.620
Someone who is less wicked is generally easier to convert, particularly what they believe is already parallel to Christianity.

01:33:54.400 --> 01:33:59.600
So, yes, Japheth, Jupiter, those things, definitely related.

01:33:59.600 --> 01:34:07.960
Kind of hard at this distance to figure out exactly what fed into it and how things got changed over time.

01:34:07.960 --> 01:34:13.220
We just don't have the documents to draw that out, because most of them have been lost to time.

01:34:13.220 --> 01:34:14.480
They were written on animal skins.

01:34:14.480 --> 01:34:16.980
They decayed, if they were written down at all.

01:34:26.638 --> 01:34:30.398
I'm trying to get around my camera, which is blocking the question I want to read.

01:34:30.398 --> 01:34:35.078
You previously recommended I'm Not Afraid by Robert Bennett to understand African syncretism.

01:34:35.078 --> 01:34:40.118
Do you have any other thoughts on that book or its sequel?

01:34:40.118 --> 01:34:44.058
It's been a long time since I looked at that book, so I don't really have any particular thoughts on it.

01:34:44.058 --> 01:34:58.858
I think it, from what I remember, it's really a good view of some of the challenges of dealing with trying to Christianize people who just have a very wicked mythology and a very corrupted view of the world.

01:34:58.858 --> 01:35:16.598
And yes, it is not as frank as perhaps some in our circles would be, but it's a pretty blunt depiction of the reality of dealing with people in Africa and trying to get them to not just become Christian, but stay Christian.

01:35:16.598 --> 01:35:28.958
And also, of course, the reality of demonic possession and just the presence of the demonic in places that have been so far from Christ for so long.

01:35:28.958 --> 01:35:31.338
You can feel the evil in some places.

01:35:43.768 --> 01:35:52.948
I think that is probably it for this time.

01:35:52.948 --> 01:35:55.348
I think that's 20 questions.

01:35:55.348 --> 01:35:58.668
I think that's probably pretty good for one week.

01:35:58.668 --> 01:36:01.308
So I think I will call it here.

01:36:01.308 --> 01:36:04.328
If I missed your question, by all means, submit it on the forum.

01:36:04.328 --> 01:36:08.728
That is, of course, as I always say, the preferred way to submit the questions.

01:36:08.728 --> 01:36:12.568
So if you have a question you would like to ask me, you can submit it on the forum.

01:36:12.648 --> 01:36:15.588
The link will be in the show notes for the episode.

01:36:15.588 --> 01:36:19.048
It should also be in the notes or the description for the stream.

01:36:19.048 --> 01:36:20.688
You can find that.

01:36:20.688 --> 01:36:24.888
It's omnifora.com, and then you can just find the request category.

01:36:24.888 --> 01:36:32.828
If you want to submit a question elsewhere, that's also, of course, find my Telegram channel on X or in the comments here.

01:36:32.828 --> 01:36:46.008
If you submit it in the comments to a previous video, it will probably take me longer to notice it, just because I have a wild amount of notifications to try to get through, and sometimes I miss things.

01:36:46.008 --> 01:36:57.148
But if I see your question, I will try to copy it into, I have a standing thread on the forum of all of the questions I have in my backlog.

01:36:57.148 --> 01:37:02.048
So if you don't see it there, please submit it on the forum or somewhere where I notice it.

01:37:02.048 --> 01:37:10.728
I try to go through and like the questions on X so that the person knows that I saw it and added it to my list, or I'm going to answer it.

01:37:10.728 --> 01:37:13.388
But I think that's basically all of the housekeeping.

01:37:13.388 --> 01:37:17.968
And since it's Thursday, I guess we still have a little bit of work and other things to do tomorrow.

01:37:17.968 --> 01:37:21.108
But I hope you all have a great weekend coming up.

01:37:21.108 --> 01:37:23.728
And of course, go to church on Sunday.

01:37:23.728 --> 01:37:27.208
And God bless you all until I see you next week.

01:37:27.208 --> 01:37:27.548
God bless.

Footer